Skip to main content

Security report for goodwillaz.org

Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona operates as a regional non-profit organization focused on retail thrift stores, donation services, and job assistance programs to support community development. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear messaging targeting the general public interested in shopping, donating, or seeking employment support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks such as Bootstrap 5 and FontAwesome 6 Pro, providing a good user experience and mobile optimization. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, and no security headers were detected, which are areas for improvement in compliance and security posture. The extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts indicates a moderate to extensive user tracking level, but privacy compliance is currently poor. Overall, the domain registration information is privacy protected, which is typical for non-profit entities, and no suspicious patterns were found. The website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, allowing a full content analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goodwillaz.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
27
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a key non-profit player in Central and Northern Arizona, leveraging retail thrift stores and donation programs as primary revenue streams to fund job assistance and workforce development services. The business model is community-centric, focusing on social impact rather than profit. The website's SEO and structured data implementation support discoverability and user engagement. The presence of multiple advertising and tracking services suggests an active marketing approach to reach donors and shoppers. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent regional operation. The lack of explicit contact information on the analyzed page may limit direct engagement but is common in non-profit websites that rely on physical locations and community presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, combined with extensive tracking scripts, presents compliance risks under regulations like GDPR. Incident response and security policy information are not found, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. The security score reflects these observations, suggesting moderate maturity with room for improvement in best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance and transparency.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to build trust and readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits and update plugins/themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet standards and improve user experience for all audiences.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona
Description
Whether you're here to shop, donate or need job assistance, Goodwill of Central and Northern Arizona is here to help create a better future for the community.
Key services
Retail thrift stores, Donation services, Job assistance and workforce development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Bootstrap 5, jQuery, FontAwesome 6 Pro, Gravity Forms, Easy Fancybox, Events Calendar Pro
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of security and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Inspectlet, Hotjar, TVSquared
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
StackAdapt, Nextdoor Ads, Reddit Ads, Hotjar
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Inspectlet, TVSquared
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content
  2. No WHOIS registrar or creation/expiry dates found due to malformed WHOIS response
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in provided HTML
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts detected
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in provided HTML snippet
  6. Good SEO metadata and structured data present
  7. No security headers detected in provided data
  8. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins
  9. No adult or NSFW content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using a modern tech stack including Bootstrap 5 for responsive design, FontAwesome 6 Pro for icons, and several plugins such as Gravity Forms and Events Calendar Pro. The site loads multiple asynchronous scripts for analytics and advertising, which may impact performance but enable detailed user tracking and marketing insights. The HTML structure includes proper meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for SEO optimization. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goodwillaz.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goodwillaz.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.