Skip to main content

Security report for goodpack.com

Goodpack IBC (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. · Transportation · Singapore

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Goodpack IBC (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. is a leading global provider of reusable intermediate bulk containers (IBCs) designed to optimize supply chains through a flexible pay-per-use leasing model. The company serves diverse industries including rubber, automotive, food and beverage, and chemicals, emphasizing sustainability and cost efficiency. Their extensive global network includes subsidiaries and offices across Asia, Europe, the Americas, and Africa, supporting a large-scale logistics operation. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content and clear navigation, targeting businesses seeking eco-friendly and efficient packaging solutions. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Luxy.js, and Splide.js for enhanced user experience. Hosting and CDN services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring good content delivery performance. The site includes Google Analytics for user tracking and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Mobile optimization and SEO practices are well implemented, though performance metrics are not explicitly provided. From a security perspective, the site has implemented some security headers including HSTS and CSP frame-ancestors, but critically lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate and does not support modern TLS protocols, exposing users to potential risks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. Privacy compliance is strong with a clear privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and GDPR considerations. Overall, Goodpack’s website demonstrates strong business credibility and digital maturity but requires urgent remediation of SSL/TLS issues to ensure secure communications and maintain trust. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency and incident response readiness would further enhance their security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goodpack.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
60
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention goodpack.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
112
Employees
0
Customers
19
Third parties
93
Weak passwords
6%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for goodpack.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Goodpack holds a strong market position as the world’s largest provider of reusable pallet-sized packaging solutions, focusing on sustainable logistics through reusable IBC containers. Their pay-per-use business model reduces capital expenditure for clients and promotes environmental responsibility. The company’s global footprint with multiple subsidiaries supports diverse industries, enabling efficient multimodal transport solutions. Their digital platforms facilitate container management and tracking, enhancing customer experience. Partnerships and certifications (Ecovadis, ISO, ASTM) reinforce their credibility. The company targets medium to large enterprises with complex supply chain needs, leveraging sustainability as a competitive advantage. Growth indicators include strategic partnerships and active participation in industry events. The business model is scalable and aligned with global sustainability trends.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but with critical gaps. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent a major vulnerability, potentially exposing data in transit to interception or tampering. Security headers like HSTS and CSP are partially implemented, providing some protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is well addressed with cookie consent and privacy policy adherence. The use of Google reCAPTCHA and secure cookie flags indicates attention to security best practices. However, the lack of secure HTTPS undermines overall security and user trust. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is essential to elevate security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure user connections.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) to ensure strong encryption.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Expand Content Security Policy to cover scripts, styles, and other resources to mitigate XSS risks.
  5. Implement OCSP stapling and session resumption to enhance SSL performance and security.
  6. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  7. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  8. Maintain and document data retention policies aligned with GDPR and other regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Goodpack IBC (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, utilizing modern front-end technologies including jQuery, Luxy.js for smooth scrolling, Splide.js for carousels, and Adobe Typekit for fonts. Hosting and CDN services are provided by Cloudflare, which caches content effectively as indicated by cache HIT headers. The site uses Google Analytics (GA4) with IP anonymization and Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection. Performance data is not explicitly available but the use of CDN and optimized images suggests moderate to good performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and media queries. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and structured JSON-LD data describing the business and its multiple global locations. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking, with no valid certificate and no enabled TLS protocols, which is a significant technical risk. The site uses secure cookie flags and has implemented some security headers but could improve CSP coverage. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goodpack.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goodpack.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.