Skip to main content

Security report for goldbeck-rhomberg.com

GOLDBECK RHOMBERG GmbH · Real Estate · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GOLDBECK RHOMBERG GmbH is a well-established construction and real estate services company with over 50 years of experience, primarily operating in Austria and Europe. The company offers comprehensive services including the turnkey construction of logistics and industrial halls, office buildings, parking garages, and residential buildings, positioning itself as an integrated provider in the real estate sector. Their business model focuses on delivering end-to-end solutions from design to operation, including parking services. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Express, hosted on Vercel, and uses TYPO3 CMS for content management. The site is well-optimized for SEO, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, with a professional design and clear navigation. However, the security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of enabled TLS protocols, which is a critical issue that needs immediate remediation. Privacy compliance is strong, with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms in place. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional business presence but requires urgent security improvements to protect user data and maintain trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching goldbeck-rhomberg.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the real estate and construction industry, leveraging its long history and extensive service portfolio to serve businesses and organizations requiring construction and property development. Their competitive advantage lies in systematized processes across the entire real estate lifecycle and regional presence for direct customer engagement. The business model is integrated, combining design, construction, and operational services, including specialized parking services. The company demonstrates growth and innovation through recent news and press releases, strategic partnerships, and certifications such as the DGNB Gold certificate. Their digital presence is supported by a modern tech stack and active social media channels, enhancing brand visibility and customer engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture is suboptimal due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols, exposing the site to potential interception and man-in-the-middle attacks. While the site implements a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy and other security headers, the absence of HTTPS is a critical vulnerability. No known major vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, but the lack of OCSP stapling and session resumption reduces security and performance. There is no public incident response or security policy disclosed, which could impact the company's readiness to handle security incidents. Immediate actions should focus on obtaining and deploying a valid SSL certificate and enabling modern TLS protocols to ensure secure communications.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3 protocols to ensure secure and modern encryption standards.
  3. Activate HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  4. Implement OCSP stapling to improve certificate revocation checks and reduce latency.
  5. Develop and publish a security policy and incident response plan to enhance transparency and preparedness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GOLDBECK RHOMBERG GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Nuxt.js for frontend rendering, Express as the backend framework, and is hosted on Vercel, a cloud platform optimized for performance and scalability. The CMS is TYPO3, indicating a robust content management system. The site uses Tailwind CSS for styling, ensuring responsive and consistent design. Performance metrics are not explicitly provided but the use of Vercel and modern frameworks suggests moderate to good performance. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are well implemented with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD data. However, the lack of SSL impacts overall technical security and trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with goldbeck-rhomberg.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review goldbeck-rhomberg.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.