Skip to main content

Security report for gmraero.com

GMR Airports Limited · Transportation · India

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GMR Airports Limited (GAL) is a prominent global airport infrastructure developer and operator with a strong presence in India and Southeast Asia. The company manages several major airports, offers a broad range of aviation-related services including retail, cargo, MRO, and real estate development through its Aerotropolis concept. The website reflects a mature, well-established business with a clear market leadership position in airport operations and infrastructure. Technically, the site is built on ASP.NET, uses modern JavaScript libraries, and is hosted behind Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and GDPR compliance mechanisms. The security posture is solid with HTTPS and no visible vulnerabilities, but lacks explicit incident response and security policy disclosures. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for its target audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gmraero.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GAL operates as a large enterprise in the transportation sector, focusing on airport infrastructure and related services. Its business model integrates airport operations, retail, cargo, MRO, and real estate development, supported by aviation education and digital innovation subsidiaries. The company benefits from strategic partnerships, including Groupe ADP, and maintains a diversified portfolio of airports and services. The website's extensive linking to subsidiaries and partner domains indicates a broad ecosystem. The company targets investors, government bodies, and aviation stakeholders, emphasizing sustainability and operational excellence. The domain age and registration details align with the company's corporate history, reinforcing credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses Cloudflare DNS, enhancing security and availability. No DNSSEC is enabled, which is a recommended improvement. The site lacks visible security headers such as CSP or HSTS, which could mitigate certain attack vectors. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact emails are found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Tag Manager is standard but requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional headers, policies, and cookie consent mechanisms to improve compliance and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GMR Airports Limited
Registration number
L52231HR1996PLC113564
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GMR Airports Limited
Description
GMR Airports Limited (GAL) is a leading global airport platform company with over two decades of experience in designing, constructing, and operating world-class sustainable airports. It offers aviation solutions in retail, aero services, and real estate, operating major airports in India and internationally.
Key services
Airport operations management, Duty-Free retail, Cargo handling, Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO), Real estate development (Aerotropolis), Aviation education and training
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, FontAwesome 5.8.1, Google Fonts (Red Hat Display, Space Grotesk), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Plyr.js (video player), Slick Carousel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with rich content about airport infrastructure and related services.
  2. Strong presence of structured data and SEO metadata.
  3. Multiple external links to related business units and partner sites.
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR relevant content.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics for tracking.
  8. Domain registration and hosting setup is consistent and legitimate.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET with a modern front-end using jQuery, FontAwesome, and Google Fonts. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for tracking. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing DNS and CDN services. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and website schema. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site uses video content with Plyr.js and a slick carousel for airport showcases, indicating a rich user experience. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and cookie consent are areas for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gmraero.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gmraero.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.