Skip to main content

Security report for gludinamaiskoks.lv

SIA Wood Design Workshop · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gludināmais Koks is a Latvian small business specializing in the manufacturing and retail of wooden ironing boards and restoration services for RVR boards. Established since 2011, the company positions itself as a quality local brand with recognition in Latvian export and innovation awards. The website provides detailed product information, purchase options, and contact details, targeting Latvian consumers seeking practical and aesthetic home goods. Technically, the site is built on the Mozello CMS platform, uses Amazon CloudFront CDN, and integrates common analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized and offers a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved, limiting full domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve privacy compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gludinamaiskoks.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail and manufacturing sectors, focusing on wooden home goods with a niche in ironing boards and restoration services. Its business model combines product sales with value-added services, targeting local Latvian customers. The brand emphasizes quality, tradition, and sustainability, appealing to consumers valuing durable and aesthetic household items. The website content and structure support this positioning, with clear product descriptions and purchase options. The company appears to be small-sized with no visible subsidiaries or parent companies. The use of local addresses and Latvian language content confirms its regional focus. The presence of Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel indicates an interest in marketing and customer insights, though no affiliate or partner domains were identified.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure login forms, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which are important for mature security governance. The site also lacks a cookie consent banner, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel introduces moderate tracking but no immediate security concerns. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with better headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security headers to enhance security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to minimize vulnerability risks.
  5. Obtain and display relevant certifications or trust badges to improve business credibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA Wood Design Workshop
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Wood Design Workshop
Description
Latvijā ražoti koka gludināmie dēļi, piedāvājot kvalitatīvus, gaumīgus un praktiskus koka gludināmos dēļus un RVR dēļu atjaunošanas pakalpojumus.
Key services
Wooden ironing boards manufacturing, RVR board restoration services, Accessory sales (fabric covers, foam, etc.)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Mozello CMS
Platforms
Mozello CMS platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure login form with password field

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Engaga
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern tracking technologies.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banner detected.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided in footer.
  6. Site content is focused on Latvian market with local language support.
  7. No security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt present.
  9. Site uses Mozello CMS and Amazon CloudFront CDN.
  10. No social media links visible on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mozello CMS platform and uses Amazon CloudFront as a CDN, which supports good performance and availability. The technology stack includes jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3 for galleries, and standard analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and basic accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic with meta description and canonical tags present. The site does not use advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries beyond jQuery. Performance is moderate, likely due to the use of CDN and optimized images. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities exist, such as upgrading jQuery and enhancing accessibility compliance. No critical technical risks were identified that would impact business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gludinamaiskoks.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gludinamaiskoks.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.