Skip to main content

Security report for gkff.org

George Kaiser Family Foundation · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The George Kaiser Family Foundation (GKFF) is a well-established philanthropic organization focused on empowering children through education, strengthening family well-being, and revitalizing neighborhoods primarily in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The foundation operates multiple community programs targeting early childhood development, community well-being and justice, city vibrancy, and strong neighborhoods. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with comprehensive content aimed at community members, partners, and prospective grantees. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Finsweet attributes for enhanced user experience. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and accessible, with good SEO practices. However, some security best practices such as security headers and explicit incident response information are missing. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with an excellent SSL configuration and does not expose sensitive data. There is no evidence of vulnerabilities or malicious content. Privacy compliance is generally good with a clear privacy policy and terms of use, though a cookie consent mechanism is absent. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is typical and justified for a non-profit entity. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture and business credibility with minor areas for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency. The risk level is low, and the site is trustworthy for its intended audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gkff.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
49
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GKFF holds a strong market position as a large non-profit philanthropic foundation with a local focus on Tulsa. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive community programs and strong partnerships. The foundation's business model centers on grant-making and community development initiatives. Revenue streams likely include endowment income and donations. Target customers include community organizations, families, and local government partners. Growth indicators include active program expansion and community impact stories. The foundation maintains a broad partnership ecosystem but no direct related or subsidiary domains were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of public incident response contacts represent gaps. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Data protection practices appear adequate, but cookie consent mechanisms should be implemented to enhance GDPR compliance. Overall, the security culture is implied but not explicitly communicated.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish incident response and security contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
George Kaiser Family Foundation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
George Kaiser Family Foundation
Description
Together with the community, GKFF redefines what's possible - empowering children through education, strengthening family well-being and revitalizing neighborhoods to create a thriving, vibrant city for everyone.
Key services
Early Childhood Development and Education, Community Well-being and Justice, Strong Neighborhoods revitalization, City Vibrancy initiatives, Accelerator Grants, Programs and partnerships
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Finsweet Attributes (richtext, cmsslider), jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is rich, professionally presented, and well-structured
  3. Strong focus on community, education, and philanthropy
  4. No security policy or incident response info publicly available
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request or privacy protection
  6. Social media presence is broad and consistent
  7. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR compliance claims
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern web fonts and JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Finsweet attributes for enhanced UI components. Hosting is provided by Webflow, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. The site loads quickly and is mobile-optimized with responsive design. SEO is well addressed with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Technical debt appears low, but opportunities exist to improve security headers and privacy mechanisms. The infrastructure supports the foundation's mission effectively with minimal technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gkff.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gkff.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.