Skip to main content

Security report for gitana.lt

UAB "Gitana" · Retail · Lithuania

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB "Gitana" operates a professional e-commerce platform specializing in tools and industrial equipment primarily serving construction workers, craftsmen, and industrial clients in Lithuania. The website offers a broad catalog of products including battery-powered, electric, pneumatic, hydraulic, and hand tools, as well as related equipment and accessories. The company emphasizes fast delivery and professional consultation services, positioning itself as a significant player in the Lithuanian tools retail market. Technically, the website is built on the PrestaShop CMS platform and incorporates modern web technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Stripe.js for payments, and responsive design frameworks like Bootstrap. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with clear navigation and structured content. SEO practices are adequately implemented with proper meta tags and product structured data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms with granular consent management, reflecting basic privacy compliance efforts. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not evident, and no dedicated security or incident response policies are published. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, slightly impacting trust. Overall, the website presents a professional and functional e-commerce presence with moderate security and privacy maturity. Strategic improvements in transparency, security headers, and incident response communication would enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gitana.lt

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
80
Average
55
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gitana targets the Lithuanian construction and industrial sectors with a comprehensive product offering of tools and equipment. Its business model is retail-focused with additional services like tool repair and spare parts supply. The company leverages digital channels for sales and customer engagement, supported by a well-structured online catalog. The presence of leasing options and fast pickup services indicates a customer-centric approach. While the company appears established and medium-sized, lack of public WHOIS data limits external verification. The partnership ecosystem includes major tool manufacturers such as Makita, Bosch, Milwaukee, and others, enhancing product credibility. Growth indicators include frequent promotions and new product introductions. The company could benefit from enhanced digital marketing transparency and security posture to strengthen competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website maintains a baseline security posture with enforced HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR principles. Use of Google Tag Manager allows controlled script deployment, reducing risk of malicious code injection. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options exposes potential risks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency and incident response readiness. Contact information is available but lacks dedicated security contacts. No signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response capabilities.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and deploy security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response transparency.
  4. Add a dedicated security or abuse contact email address to improve communication channels for security incidents.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB "Gitana"
Description
Techninis tiekimas pramonei ir statyboms – ko gero, didžiausias įrankių pasirinkimas ir remontas. Greitas įrankių pristatymas ir profesionalios konsultacijos.
Key services
Tool sales (battery, electric, pneumatic, hydraulic, hand tools), Equipment sales (construction, garden, welding, automotive), Tool repair and spare parts, Fast delivery and professional consultation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
PrestaShop, Google Tag Manager, Stripe.js, jQuery UI Autocomplete, Bootstrap, bxSlider
Frameworks
PrestaShop
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular consent management
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads Conversion Tracking
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Omnisnippet
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for tools and industrial equipment in Lithuania
  2. Uses PrestaShop CMS with modern web technologies
  3. Has cookie consent mechanism with granular consent management
  4. No visible privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  5. Contact information including emails and phone numbers clearly displayed in header
  6. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded
  7. No WAF or blocking detected, full content accessible
  8. Security headers partially present, SSL enabled
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  10. Good product catalog with pricing and availability information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by PrestaShop CMS, a widely used e-commerce platform, indicating a mature and scalable infrastructure. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Stripe.js reflects modern payment and analytics capabilities. The site uses responsive design frameworks ensuring good mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with some asynchronous script loading to improve user experience. SEO is supported by structured data and meta tags. However, technical debt is suggested by missing advanced security headers and incomplete privacy documentation. Hosting provider details are not explicit, limiting infrastructure risk assessment. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and enhance accessibility compliance to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gitana.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gitana.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.