Skip to main content

Security report for ginko.voyage

Grand Besançon Métropole · Transportation · France

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.ginko.voyage serves as the official digital platform for Grand Besançon Métropole's public transportation services, branded as Ginko. It provides users with access to schedules, route planning, and ticket purchasing functionalities, targeting residents and visitors of the Grand Besançon metropolitan area in France. The site is professionally designed with a consistent brand identity and offers accessibility features to accommodate diverse user needs. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, leveraging modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for analytics and compliance. The site is mobile-optimized and includes SEO best practices. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements, although explicit security headers are not fully confirmed. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is common and justified for this type of public service website. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence with good security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ginko.voyage

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Grand Besançon Métropole operates Ginko as its regional public transportation service, positioning itself as a key mobility provider in the region. The business model focuses on providing accessible and user-friendly transit information and ticketing services to the public. The website supports this by integrating route planning tools and online ticket sales, enhancing customer convenience. Partnerships with service providers like atmo-bfc.org and use of third-party services such as Google Analytics and Cookiebot indicate a well-integrated ecosystem. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a preference for contact via web forms, typical for public entities. The site’s content and services align well with the transportation sector, targeting a medium-sized regional audience.

Security posture

The website maintains a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies by necessity, preferences, statistics, and marketing. The use of Cookiebot ensures compliance with GDPR cookie regulations. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options were not identified in the provided content and should be verified and implemented if missing. No signs of vulnerabilities, malware, or phishing were found. The site does not publicly disclose a security policy or incident response contacts, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the site’s purpose but could benefit from additional hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility by providing official emails or phone numbers for customer support and security reporting.
  5. Maintain and monitor cookie consent mechanisms to ensure ongoing compliance with evolving privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Grand Besançon Métropole
Description
Découvrez les mobilités et les services Ginko : consultez vos horaires, planifiez vos trajets et achetez vos titres de transport en quelques clics !
Key services
Public transport schedules, Route planning, Ticket purchasing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Google Fonts, jQuery UI
Frameworks
TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories and opt-in/out toggles
  3. No exposed emails or phone numbers in the HTML content provided
  4. Uses TYPO3 CMS and modern web technologies
  5. Includes accessibility features such as high contrast mode and skip links
  6. No visible security policy or incident response contact information
  7. No terms of service page detected
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection or query failure
  9. Website content is in French and targets regional public transport users
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a stable and scalable infrastructure. It uses jQuery and jQuery UI for frontend interactivity, Google Tag Manager for analytics management, and Cookiebot for cookie consent compliance. The site loads Google Fonts asynchronously and includes accessibility features such as high contrast mode and skip links, enhancing usability. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed and resource management. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is solid with modern standards but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ginko.voyage. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ginko.voyage.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.