Skip to main content

Security report for gilan.com

Gilan Jewellery · Retail · Turkey

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gilan Jewellery is a family-owned luxury jewellery house based in Istanbul, Turkey, specializing in contemporary and high luxury haute jewellery. The company offers a range of unique collections, bespoke jewellery commissions, and wedding jewellery, targeting discerning luxury buyers and collectors. The website reflects a high level of professionalism with rich content, clear navigation, and a strong brand presence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, leveraging modern libraries and frameworks such as jQuery, Bootstrap, and Slick Carousel. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a mature digital marketing strategy. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and use of reCAPTCHA on forms, though some security headers are not explicitly detected and no formal security policy or incident response information is published. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or registration issues, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is safe, well-optimized, and compliant with privacy regulations, but domain registration legitimacy should be verified for full assurance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gilan.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gilan Jewellery positions itself as a niche luxury brand with a focus on bespoke and high jewellery collections inspired by Istanbul's heritage. The business model centers on direct retail through boutiques and an online shop, complemented by bespoke services that cater to personalized customer experiences. The presence of celebrity endorsements and detailed product collections enhances brand prestige and market positioning. The company targets affluent customers seeking unique, high-end jewellery pieces. The website's integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of explicit security and incident response policies may pose risks in trust and compliance perception. The company appears to be small-sized with a focused sector in retail luxury jewellery.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and the use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms from automated abuse. Trusted third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could be addressed to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, and no incident response contact information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The missing WHOIS data raises questions about domain registration legitimacy, which is a critical trust factor. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with additional headers, policies, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify domain registration status and update WHOIS information to enhance business credibility and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gilan Jewellery
Description
Gilan is a family owned jewellery house, designing contemporary and high luxury haute jewellery inspired by Istanbul.
Key services
High jewellery collections, Bespoke jewellery commissions, Wedding jewellery, Retail sales via boutiques and online shop
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and analytics scripts from trusted sources

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich with clear navigation.
  2. Multiple forms collect personal data with reCAPTCHA protection.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and linked.
  4. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Use of multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  7. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  8. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality. It uses modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive UI components. The site employs Bootstrap for responsive design and Google Fonts for typography. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, indicating a comprehensive approach to user behavior tracking and marketing optimization. The site loads multiple external resources from trusted CDNs and domains, supporting performance and reliability. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO practices are evident through meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility compliance. No hosting provider details were detected from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gilan.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gilan.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.