Skip to main content

Security report for giantrabbit.com

Giant Rabbit LLC · Non-profit · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Giant Rabbit LLC is a specialized digital agency focused on developing and supporting websites and data systems for nonprofit organizations. Established in 2003, the company offers a comprehensive suite of services including strategy, design, development, CRM selection and data migration, fundraising analytics, Drupal upgrades, project rescues, managed hosting, support, maintenance, and security. Their market position is niche, targeting nonprofits with pragmatic and mission-focused digital solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand with clear service offerings and contact information. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern JavaScript and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting and DNS services are provided via Amazon AWS infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, though performance is moderate. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates room for improvement in security hardening. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and domain registration protections but lacks published security policies, incident response information, and cookie consent mechanisms, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional policies and technical controls. The overall risk assessment is low with recommendations to enable DNSSEC, implement cookie consent, publish security and incident response policies, and add security headers. These steps will improve compliance, user trust, and reduce potential attack surface.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching giantrabbit.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention giantrabbit.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for giantrabbit.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Giant Rabbit operates as a small, specialized digital services provider for the nonprofit sector. Their competitive advantage lies in deep domain expertise in nonprofit digital needs and a comprehensive service offering from strategy through ongoing support. The business model is service-based with revenue likely from project engagements and managed services. The target customers are nonprofit organizations seeking mission-aligned digital solutions. Growth indicators include a long-established domain and consistent branding. The partnership ecosystem includes creative collaborators such as artists (e.g., RBlack). Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality and long-term client relationships rather than volume or mass-market approaches.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The domain uses registrar-level protections and HTTPS but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. No incident response or security policies are published, indicating gaps in formal security governance and compliance. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager without cookie consent reduces privacy compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but the absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file limits transparency. Overall, the security culture appears informal and could benefit from formalization and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Implement a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve governance and user trust.
  4. Add security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Consider creating and publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Giant Rabbit LLC
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Giant Rabbit LLC
Description
Giant Rabbit develops and supports websites and data systems for nonprofits. They provide pragmatic, mission-focused digital strategy, design, development, CRM selection and data migration, fundraising and user analytics, Drupal upgrades, project rescues, managed hosting, support, maintenance, and security services.
Key services
Strategy, Design, Development, CRM Selection & Data Migration, Fundraising & User Analytics, Drupal 7 Upgrades to Backdrop CMS, Project Rescues, Managed Hosting, Support & Maintenance, Security
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, JavaScript, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited domain statuses

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on nonprofit digital services with clear navigation and professional design.
  3. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published on site.
  5. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation of the domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS, indicating a modern and supported platform. The tech stack includes JavaScript and integration with Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. Hosting is inferred to be on Amazon AWS based on DNS and registrar data. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. Performance is moderate, suggesting potential for optimization. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt in security hardening. No broken elements or errors were detected, indicating stable technical implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with giantrabbit.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review giantrabbit.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.