Skip to main content

Security report for geveko-markings.nl

Geveko Markings · Transportation · Denmark

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Geveko Markings is a well-established company specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of road marking materials and solutions globally. With over 100 years of industry experience, the company offers a comprehensive product portfolio including preformed materials, hot-applied materials, paints, beads, aggregates, and equipment. Their website reflects a strong market position with detailed product lines, solutions for various traffic and safety needs, and a global presence through multiple regional domains. Technically, the website is built on a modern CMS platform (Swift CMS) with responsive design, good SEO, and accessibility features. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates moderate user tracking with privacy compliance mechanisms in place. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present, although public security policies and incident response information are not disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data suggests privacy protection, which is justified for a large enterprise. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and business-focused with no signs of malicious activity or content blocking.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geveko-markings.nl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Geveko Markings operates in the transportation sector, targeting municipalities, contractors, and businesses involved in road infrastructure and safety. Their business model centers on manufacturing and supplying high-quality road marking materials and related products. The company leverages a strong product portfolio and local presence to maintain competitive advantages. The website's multiple regional domains indicate a global distribution strategy. Trust signals such as ISO9001 certification, investor relations, and career opportunities enhance credibility. Marketing efforts include social media engagement and content-rich resources like brochures and case studies. The company appears to prioritize sustainability and innovation, aligning with modern infrastructure needs.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive set of security headers including HSTS, CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, and others. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. Forms appear to be secured by the CMS, though explicit CSRF tokens were not visible in the snippet. However, the site lacks publicly available security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure programs, which are recommended for transparency and readiness. No security.txt file was found. Overall, the security measures are solid but could be improved by publishing formal security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide contact details for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to enhance GDPR compliance visibility.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks.
  5. Enhance performance optimization to improve loading speed and user experience, especially on mobile devices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Geveko Markings
Description
Geveko Markings develop, manufacture, and distribute horizontal markings in any size, material, colour or form that meet the requirements of your segment.
Key services
Road marking materials, Traffic safety solutions, Surface repair products, Decorative surfacing, Accessibility and safety markings
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap, Swiffy Slider, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with CSRF tokens likely (based on CMS)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. Strong focus on road marking solutions and related products
  3. Multiple regional sites linked indicating global presence
  4. Use of modern web technologies and CMS
  5. Presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms
  6. Contact information clearly provided including email and phone
  7. Social media presence on major platforms
  8. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  9. No public security or incident response policies found
  10. WHOIS data unavailable, possibly due to privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Swift CMS with modern front-end technologies including Bootstrap and Swiffy Slider for responsive design and interactive elements. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO meta tags including Open Graph for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable online presence suitable for a large enterprise. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geveko-markings.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geveko-markings.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.