Skip to main content

Security report for geveko-markings.de

Geveko Markings Germany GmbH · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Geveko Markings Germany GmbH is a well-established company specializing in the development, production, and distribution of horizontal road marking materials tailored to various sizes, materials, colors, and forms to meet segment-specific requirements. With over 100 years of experience and ISO 9001 certification, the company holds a strong market position in the transportation sector, serving primarily B2B customers focused on traffic safety and infrastructure. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, clear navigation, and multi-channel contact options. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, hosted by Kortermann Hosting in Germany. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and privacy compliance evident through cookie consent mechanisms and a detailed privacy policy. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious patterns were detected, indicating a trustworthy and professional online presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching geveko-markings.de

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention geveko-markings.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for geveko-markings.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation sector, focusing on road marking solutions that enhance traffic safety and urban mobility. Its business model revolves around manufacturing and supplying durable marking materials and related products, supported by local sales and technical teams. The website indicates a global footprint with regional sites and a strong emphasis on sustainability and quality. The presence of social media channels and a whistleblower system suggests a commitment to transparency and corporate governance. The company leverages partnerships and a global supply chain to ensure product availability. Growth indicators include a broad product portfolio and diverse solution offerings tailored to public spaces, parking areas, decorative surfaces, and safety enhancements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and use of security best practices such as cookie consent and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, some standard security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected and should be implemented to enhance protection against common web threats. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts is managed with user consent, aligning with GDPR requirements. No signs of malware, phishing, or other security incidents were found. Incident response and security policy documentation are not publicly available, which could be improved to strengthen trust and readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to improve security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies for vulnerabilities and update accordingly.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing data retention policies related to analytics and tracking.
  5. Maintain and update privacy and cookie policies to reflect evolving legal requirements and best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Geveko Markings Germany GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Geveko Markings Germany GmbH
Description
Geveko Markings entwickelt, produziert und vertreibt horizontale Markierungen in jeder Größe, jedem Material, jeder Farbe und Form, die den Anforderungen Ihres Segments entsprechen.
Key services
Entwicklung von Straßenmarkierungen, Produktion von Markierungsmaterialien, Vertrieb von Markierungslösungen, Beratung und Projektunterstützung
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap (CSS classes detected), Swiffy Slider, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of consent management for cookies
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible and professionally designed.
  2. Strong focus on B2B transportation and road marking solutions.
  3. Comprehensive navigation and content structure.
  4. Good privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms.
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools with consent.
  6. Clear contact information and multiple communication channels.
  7. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Bootstrap framework, managed via Swift CMS. It integrates advanced UI components like Swiffy Slider for interactive content display. Hosting is provided by Kortermann Hosting, indicating a regional hosting provider in Germany. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is well addressed through meta tags and structured navigation. The site uses Google Tag Manager to manage analytics and marketing tags efficiently. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and further optimize performance metrics for faster load times.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with geveko-markings.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review geveko-markings.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.