Skip to main content

Security report for getzner.com

Getzner Werkstoffe GmbH · Transportation · Austria

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

31/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Getzner Werkstoffe GmbH is a mature and established company specializing in vibration isolation solutions for the railway, construction, and industrial sectors. With over 50 years of expertise, they manufacture polyurethane elastomers such as Sylomer, Sylodyn, Sylodamp, Sylocraft, and Isotop. The company positions itself as a global leader in its niche, targeting construction professionals and industrial clients seeking sustainable noise and vibration reduction solutions. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence with strong branding and relevant content. Technically, the site uses modern tools like Matomo Analytics and Google Tag Manager but lacks a valid SSL certificate, which is a critical security flaw. The absence of HTTPS undermines user trust and exposes visitors to potential risks. Security headers are minimal, and domain security features like DNSSEC and domain locks are missing. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the business credibility is high, but the security posture requires urgent improvement to protect users and maintain trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of getzner.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getzner.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
50
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
18
Average
31

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in specialized sectors of transportation, construction, and industry, focusing on vibration isolation materials and engineering services. Their business model revolves around manufacturing proprietary materials and providing engineering support and calculation tools. The domain age and WHOIS data confirm a long-standing presence, enhancing credibility. The company actively participates in industry events and has received certifications like the Environmental Product Declaration (EPD), signaling commitment to sustainability. Their marketing ecosystem includes social media channels and newsletter subscriptions, indicating engagement with their audience. However, the lack of explicit contact emails or phone numbers on the website suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The company appears to be medium-sized with a focused market niche and a strong reputation in its field.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, which is a critical vulnerability. Although some security headers like Strict-Transport-Security are present, they are ineffective without proper SSL configuration. The site does not implement DNSSEC or CAA records, increasing the risk of DNS spoofing or unauthorized certificate issuance. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. The use of Matomo Analytics with cookie consent indicates some privacy awareness. Overall, the security maturity is low, and immediate remediation is necessary to secure communications and protect user data.

Recommendations

  1. Install and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and configure modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable legacy protocols.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security and prevent certificate misuse.
  4. Enhance security headers by enabling HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload flags.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on nginx with nameservers indicating hosting by drei.host. The tech stack includes Matomo for analytics and Google Tag Manager for tag management, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site uses external font services and modern JavaScript for UI components. However, performance data is missing, and SSL/TLS is not properly configured, which is a significant technical debt. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO metadata. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. Technical risks include lack of HTTPS and missing domain security features, which could impact business operations and user trust if exploited.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 34/100High32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getzner.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getzner.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.