Skip to main content

Security report for getclipara.com

Clipara · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clipara is a technology company providing a modern video platform designed to help brands engage customers through interactive short-form video content. Their SaaS offering enables easy video embedding, marketing, management, and analytics without requiring coding skills. The platform targets innovative brands, e-commerce, and travel sectors, positioning itself as a high-performance solution to boost engagement and conversions. Technically, the website is built on Webflow with integrations including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Crisp Chat, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS domain registration data is a notable concern, impacting domain transparency and trust. Overall, the website is professional, well-designed, and privacy compliant, but domain registration opacity and missing security disclosures suggest areas for improvement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Unregistered MX Record

      MX record points to unregistered domain: bcufplc7wibufaq6lhub2hcqxbqmmxodzjij2mlcda53moifzefq.mx-verification.google.com

      What to do: Remove or fix MX record pointing to unregistered domain

      • RFC 5321 §5.1
      • NIS2 21(2)(i)
      • IR 2024/2690 12.4: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 12.4: Asset inventory
      • NIST CM-8: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-8: System Component Inventory

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getclipara.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clipara operates in the competitive video marketing SaaS space, offering differentiated features such as shoppable and bookable interactive videos, multi-video campaigns, and video CRM marketing. Their tiered subscription plans cater to a range of customers from startups to enterprises, with free trials and money-back guarantees enhancing customer acquisition. The company leverages partnerships and affiliate programs to expand reach. Customer testimonials and case studies demonstrate effectiveness and market traction. The business model is subscription-based with additional enterprise services. The absence of detailed company registration or physical address information limits full business transparency but does not detract from the evident market positioning and growth focus.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates standard security and analytics tools, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No published security policy or incident response information is available, which may hinder transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and publishing incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Improve domain registration transparency by ensuring WHOIS data is publicly available or justified if privacy protected.
  5. Enhance business contact information by adding verified phone numbers and physical addresses to increase credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Clipara
Description
Clipara offers a video platform enabling brands to add short-form, interactive video content to websites, emails, and SMS without coding. It supports video embedding, marketing, management, analytics, and shoppable/bookable interactions.
Key services
Video embedding, Video marketing, Video management (CMS), Video analytics, Interactive and shoppable video, Campaign creation, Video CRM marketing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Fonts (Inter, Ultra, Barlow Condensed), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Crisp Chat, Finsweet Cookie Consent, Tolt, jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of third-party security and analytics scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Crisp Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional SaaS video platform targeting modern brands
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and integrations
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy presence with consent mechanism
  5. No direct phone numbers found; contact primarily via email and forms
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain transparency
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information published
  8. Pricing plans clearly detailed with free trial and enterprise options
  9. Multiple customer testimonials and case studies enhance trust
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and leverages modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Crisp Chat for analytics, marketing, and customer support. Video content is delivered via custom players embedded through iframes, optimized for mobile and desktop with lazy loading and CDN distribution. The site demonstrates fast performance, excellent mobile optimization, and good accessibility features. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. The use of multiple third-party scripts is well managed, but security headers are missing, which is a technical risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and supports the business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getclipara.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getclipara.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.