Skip to main content

Security report for getall.fr

Association GETALL · Technology · France

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Association GETALL is a French non-profit organization dedicated to promoting and educating about free software and open-source operating systems. Established over twenty years ago, the association targets both organizations such as companies and associations, as well as individuals including students and private persons. Their primary services include guidance, initiation, and educational resources related to free software. The website serves as an informational and contact platform for the association, featuring content about free software philosophy and examples, along with a contact form for inquiries. Technically, the website is built using jQuery and custom JavaScript, hosted under the domain registered with GANDI. The site uses a proprietary or custom CMS named SiteCloud. The design and user experience are basic, with limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO and metadata are minimal, and no advanced analytics or tracking technologies are detected. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance. The contact form includes basic validation but no explicit security or data protection disclosures. WHOIS data indicates a consistent and legitimate domain registration aligned with the association's stated history and location. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy but basic digital presence for a small non-profit association. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, mobile responsiveness, and content richness would enhance the site's professionalism and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching getall.fr

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
40
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Association GETALL occupies a niche position in the free software advocacy and education sector within France. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing presence and focus on guiding both organizations and individuals in mastering free software. The business model is non-profit, relying likely on community engagement and educational outreach rather than commercial revenue streams. The target customers are educational institutions, associations, companies interested in free software, and individual learners. The partnership with e2li.org suggests collaboration within the local educational or technological ecosystem. Growth indicators are limited from the website data, but the association's longevity and domain age suggest stable operations. The lack of commercial elements and advertising indicates a focus on mission over monetization.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces protection against common web attacks. The contact form uses client-side validation but lacks visible anti-CSRF tokens or CAPTCHA mechanisms. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness for security events. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation to reduce risk and improve user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  5. Consider adopting a modern CMS or framework to facilitate maintenance, security updates, and scalability.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Association GETALL
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Association GETALL
Description
Association GETALL is a non-profit organization created over twenty years ago to help structures (companies, associations) and individuals (students, private persons) discover and master free software and operating systems, most of which are free of charge.
Key services
Guidance and initiation to free software, Educational resources, Community support
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https://)
  • Form input validation on email field

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a non-profit association site focused on free software education.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact form present but no explicit security or privacy disclosures.
  4. No social media links or phone numbers found.
  5. Basic technical implementation with jQuery and custom scripts.
  6. No advanced SEO or accessibility features detected.
  7. No advertising or tracking technologies detected.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistent registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy JavaScript stack primarily based on jQuery and jQuery UI, with custom scripts for front-end interactions. The CMS appears to be a proprietary or custom solution named SiteCloud, which may limit flexibility and integration capabilities. Hosting and domain registration are managed by GANDI, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimizations detected. The site has minimal SEO metadata and lacks structured data formats such as JSON-LD or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are basic, and mobile optimization is limited, with a minimum width set to 1280px which may hinder usability on smaller devices. There is no evidence of modern frameworks or progressive web app features. Technical debt is moderate, and modernization opportunities exist to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with getall.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review getall.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.