Skip to main content

Security report for gertrude.lv

Rīgas Vecā Svētās Ģertrūdes evaņģēliski luteriskā draudze · Non-profit · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gertrude.lv represents the Rīgas Vecā Svētās Ģertrūdes evaņģēliski luteriskā draudze, a local Lutheran church based in Riga, Latvia. The site serves as an informational platform for the church community, providing details about the organization and its location. The business operates as a non-profit religious entity targeting local community members and churchgoers. The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging Wix Thunderbolt framework and standard Wix hosting infrastructure. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for visitor tracking and analytics. The site is mobile optimized and presents a professional design consistent with its religious and community focus. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and some security hardening scripts in place, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy compliance documentation. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its purpose well but could improve privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gertrude.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gertrude.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
3
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gertrude.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization is positioned as a local religious institution serving the Riga community. Its business model is non-profit, focusing on religious services and community engagement. The website content and structured data confirm the official address and organization name, enhancing credibility. The use of Wix platform indicates a cost-effective digital presence with moderate technical sophistication. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for compliance improvement. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The site targets local residents and church members, with no commercial or e-commerce activities detected.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a critical security baseline. It includes scripts to harden fetch and XMLHttpRequest calls, indicating some attention to security best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates gaps in compliance and security transparency. The site does not provide a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanism, which is recommended for responsible security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure no vulnerabilities or privacy issues are introduced.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Rīgas Vecā Svētās Ģertrūdes evaņģēliski luteriskā draudze
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Rīgas Vecā Svētās Ģertrūdes evaņģēliski luteriskā draudze
Description
A local religious organization (Lutheran church) located in Riga, Latvia, providing community and religious services.
Key services
Religious services, Community engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Wix platform, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Wix Thunderbolt
Platforms
Wix.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security override scripts to harden fetch and XHR

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets.
  2. No visible contact forms or email addresses in the HTML content.
  3. Physical address is clearly stated in structured data.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the HTML content.
  5. Use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts found.
  8. Website content is in English and Latvian (locale lv-lv).
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform using the Wix Thunderbolt framework, which provides a modern JavaScript-based infrastructure. It loads multiple scripts from Wix's static content delivery network and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site uses polyfills for legacy browser support and performance API polyfills. The CSS and JavaScript assets are minified and optimized for performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. SEO optimization is basic, with canonical tags and Open Graph metadata included but no advanced SEO features detected. The hosting provider is Wix.com, which offers reliable infrastructure but limits direct control over server-level security headers and configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gertrude.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gertrude.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.