Skip to main content

Security report for georgeandbarbarabush.org

George & Barbara Bush Foundation · Non-profit · United States

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The George & Barbara Bush Foundation is a US-based non-profit organization dedicated to preserving the legacy and philanthropic efforts of George and Barbara Bush. The foundation focuses on selfless service and family literacy programs, supported by donations and community engagement. The website serves as an informational and engagement platform for donors, alumni, and supporters, featuring a professional design and clear navigation. Technically, the site is built on modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Vue.js, hosted with reputable providers, and optimized for mobile devices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections, though improvements like DNSSEC and security headers are recommended. Privacy compliance is lacking due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching georgeandbarbarabush.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation holds a strong market position as a legacy non-profit with historical significance. Its business model relies on donations and philanthropic initiatives, targeting a broad audience including donors, alumni, and literacy advocates. The website integrates social media channels to extend outreach and engagement. While no direct revenue streams beyond donations are evident, the foundation maintains a medium organizational size with a clear focus on education and service. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for compliance improvement. The foundation's domain age and registration details align well with its operational timeline, supporting legitimacy.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain locks in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security indicates room for enhancement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file limits transparency in incident response readiness. Privacy compliance gaps, including missing privacy and cookie policies, pose regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is stable but could be strengthened to meet higher compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve incident response transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
George & Barbara Bush Foundation
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
George & Barbara Bush Foundation
Description
The George & Barbara Bush Foundation is a non-profit organization dedicated to preserving the legacy and promoting the philanthropic efforts of George and Barbara Bush. It focuses on selfless service and family literacy through various funds and initiatives.
Key services
Philanthropic initiatives, Family literacy programs, Events and alumni engagement, Donor support and fundraising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Google Fonts, Imgix (image CDN)
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in footer with phone, email, and mailing address.
  4. Social media presence on Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage; donation link redirects to external domain.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts explicitly detected in HTML content.
  8. No advertising or marketing scripts detected.
  9. Images served via Imgix CDN for performance.
  10. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern JavaScript frameworks Nuxt.js and Vue.js, indicating a contemporary and maintainable codebase. It leverages Imgix for image CDN services and Google Fonts for typography. Hosting appears to be a combination of GoDaddy for domain registration and AWS S3 for static assets. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags. However, the absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests limited user behavior insights. Technical debt appears low, but security and privacy compliance require attention to reduce operational risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with georgeandbarbarabush.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review georgeandbarbarabush.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.