Skip to main content

Security report for gemelements.com

GEM ELEMENTS · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GEM ELEMENTS is a small retail business specializing in diamond and precious stone jewelry sales based in Riga, Latvia. The website presents a professional image with a focus on high-quality diamond services and jewelry products. The business appears to be well-established since 2017, targeting consumers interested in luxury jewelry in the local market. Technically, the website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, and Select2, alongside multiple analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Inspectlet, and Facebook Pixel. Cookie consent is managed through Cookiebot, indicating a basic level of privacy compliance. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found in the provided content, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is moderate with no WAF detected and no visible vulnerabilities, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are not evident, suggesting room for improvement. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures, contact information, and security hardening to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gemelements.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
20
Email security
73
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
95
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail sector focusing on diamond and precious stone jewelry in Riga. Its business model is direct retail sales with a local market focus. The website content and domain age align with a small, established business. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates an intent to optimize customer engagement and advertising effectiveness. The absence of contact details and formal policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The company could enhance its market position by improving transparency and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and has standard domain status protections but lacks DNSSEC. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no incident response or security policy information is published. The site uses cookie consent mechanisms and reputable analytics providers, but extensive tracking may raise privacy concerns. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. To improve security posture, the company should enable DNSSEC, implement security headers, publish security policies, and ensure strong SSL/TLS configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.
  3. Add clear contact information including email and phone for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Review and minimize tracking scripts to balance marketing needs with privacy compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GEM ELEMENTS
Description
GEM ELEMENTS offers diamond sales and jewelry with precious stones in Riga, providing professional service.
Key services
Diamond sales, Jewelry with diamonds and precious stones, Professional jewelry service
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, Select2, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, Inspectlet, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Inspectlet
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Yandex Metrika, Inspectlet, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional small business site for diamond and jewelry sales in Riga.
  2. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories and vendor disclosures.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML.
  4. Multiple analytics and tracking services are used, including Google Analytics, Yandex Metrika, Inspectlet, and Facebook Pixel.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses were found in the provided HTML content.
  6. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  7. Website uses modern JavaScript libraries and plugins for UI and carousel features.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content is fully accessible.
  9. Domain WHOIS data shows a domain age of over 7 years, registered with GoDaddy, expiring in 2026.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of popular JavaScript libraries and plugins for UI components and carousels, including jQuery, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, and Select2. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Yandex Metrika, Inspectlet, and Facebook Pixel. Cookie consent is managed by Cookiebot, which provides detailed cookie categorization and vendor disclosures. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive CSS. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registrar is GoDaddy. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or backend platform was identified from the HTML content. Technical debt appears low but security enhancements are recommended. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional retail website but could benefit from improved security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gemelements.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gemelements.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.