SIA GelvoraSergel operates as a Latvian service provider specializing in debt recovery, reminder services, and real estate listings. The company targets Latvian individuals and businesses requiring financial recovery and property services, offering a client self-service portal for enhanced user experience. The website is multilingual, supporting Latvian, English, and Russian, reflecting a regional focus. The business appears small-sized, founded around 2014, with a consistent and professional online presence.
Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.5.3, utilizing modern plugins such as Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. It integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, though accessibility features are basic. Security best practices include HTTPS enforcement and form protection, but some security headers are not visibly implemented, suggesting room for improvement.
From a security perspective, the site shows a mature posture with cookie consent mechanisms and secure form handling. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates potential compliance gaps. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR requirements, but could enhance security transparency and technical hardening. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and conducting regular vulnerability assessments to strengthen the security posture and trustworthiness.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention gelvorasergel.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for gelvorasergel.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
GelvoraSergel holds a niche position in the Latvian market, focusing on debt recovery and real estate services. Its business model revolves around service provision with digital client engagement via a self-service portal. The company leverages partnerships with service providers like Cookiebot and OnWebChat for compliance and customer interaction. Revenue streams likely include fees for debt recovery and real estate transactions. The multilingual website and clear contact channels indicate a customer-centric approach. Growth indicators include recent updates and active client portal features. The absence of parent or subsidiary companies suggests an independent operation with focused market presence.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, Google reCAPTCHA integration, and comprehensive cookie consent management. However, the lack of visible security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options may expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder timely handling of security events. The site complies with GDPR through explicit consent mechanisms and privacy policies. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with opportunities to enhance transparency and technical defenses.
Recommendations
Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Enhance website accessibility to meet recognized standards.
Conduct periodic security audits and vulnerability scans to proactively identify and remediate risks.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
SIA GelvoraSergel
Description
Parādu piedziņa un uzraudzība
Key services
Debt recovery, Reminder services, Real estate catalog, Client self-service portal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
WordPress 6.5.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Socket.IO, Cookiebot
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
Cookie consent banner with granular controls
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy present
Multiple language support (LV, EN, RU)
Contact info clearly provided including phone, email, address, and contact form
Use of modern web technologies and security best practices like HTTPS and reCAPTCHA
No explicit security policy or incident response info found
No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
Business focus on debt recovery and real estate services in Latvia
Technical notes
Notes
The website is powered by WordPress CMS version 6.5.3, enhanced with Yoast SEO for search optimization and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot protection on forms. Socket.IO is included, possibly for real-time features. The site loads asynchronously many scripts from trusted CDNs, indicating a modern tech stack. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness. Accessibility is basic, suggesting potential for improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with gelvorasergel.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gelvorasergel.lv.