Skip to main content

Security report for gelvora.lv

SIA GelvoraSergel · Real Estate · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA GelvoraSergel is a Latvian company specializing in debt collection, reminder services, and real estate listings. The company offers a client self-service portal allowing users to manage their payment obligations and case information online. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and multilingual support, targeting Latvian individuals and businesses requiring debt recovery and real estate services. The business appears well-established with domain registration consistent with its operational history since 2014. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.5.3, utilizing modern plugins such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management. It employs Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, ensuring good performance and security. The site includes Google reCAPTCHA on its contact form to prevent spam and uses Cookiebot to manage GDPR-compliant cookie consent. SEO and mobile optimization are well implemented, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security best practices such as secure forms and cookie consent. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not present, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security posture, good privacy compliance, and credible business presence. Recommendations include adding a dedicated security policy, incident response information, and enhancing accessibility and security headers for further hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gelvora.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gelvora.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
87
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
87
Weak passwords
2%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for gelvora.lv.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GelvoraSergel operates in the Real Estate and debt collection sector in Latvia, serving clients who need debt recovery and property listings. The business model is service-oriented with a focus on client self-service digital tools, indicating a customer-centric approach. The company leverages partnerships with service providers like Cookiebot and Google for analytics and consent management. The presence of a client portal suggests ongoing engagement and recurring revenue streams. Market positioning appears local and specialized, with growth potential through digital services. The website content and structure reflect a professional and trustworthy brand with consistent messaging and clear service offerings.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, use of reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam, and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Security headers are likely present due to Cloudflare usage, though explicit header details are not provided. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response contact is a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the site is secure for its business scope but could benefit from formalizing security governance documentation and enhancing accessibility compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and controls.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Conduct an accessibility audit and improve features to meet WCAG standards.
  5. Review and enhance HTTP security headers to maximize protection.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA GelvoraSergel
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA GelvoraSergel
Description
Parādu piedziņa un uzraudzība
Key services
Debt collection, Reminder services, Real estate catalog, Client self-service portal
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.5.3, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Cookiebot consent management, Socket.io, Owl Carousel
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins
  2. Cookie consent and GDPR compliance mechanisms are implemented
  3. Contact form secured with Google reCAPTCHA
  4. Clear business contact information and physical address provided
  5. No evidence of security blocking or WAF challenges
  6. Good SEO and social language support (LV, EN, RU)
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with up-to-date plugins including Yoast SEO and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, improving performance and security. Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA are integrated for analytics and spam prevention. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes multilingual support (Latvian, English, Russian). Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is well-chosen for a small to medium-sized service provider, though ongoing maintenance and security updates are essential to sustain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gelvora.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gelvora.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.