Skip to main content

Security report for gefahrgutjaeger.de

GEFAHRGUTJÄGER GmbH · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GEFAHRGUTJÄGER GmbH is a specialized consulting and legal services provider focused on hazardous goods law, hazardous substances, waste management, immission control, and occupational safety. The company targets businesses and professionals requiring expert advice and training in compliance with German and EU regulations. Their market position is that of a niche specialist with a strong focus on regulatory compliance and education. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO, indicating a mature digital presence. Integration of Google Analytics and Maps is managed with user consent, reflecting good privacy practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and security headers implemented, although no explicit security policy or incident response information is published. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-maintained, and compliant with GDPR requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gefahrgutjaeger.de

This scan found 22 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gefahrgutjaeger.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gefahrgutjaeger.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the transportation and energy sectors, providing essential consulting and legal services related to hazardous materials. Their business model revolves around advisory, training, and legal compliance services. The website content and structure suggest a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and clear contact information. The use of professional plugins and cookie consent mechanisms indicates awareness of regulatory requirements. No evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries was found. The company appears focused on serving a specialized market segment with a strong compliance orientation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers present. The cookie consent mechanism is comprehensive and respects GDPR and ePrivacy directives. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, which could improve trust and readiness. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formal documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Add incident response contact information or abuse email addresses to improve transparency.
  3. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GEFAHRGUTJÄGER GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GEFAHRGUTJÄGER GmbH
Description
Spezialist für Gefahrgut, Gefahrstoff, juristische Dienstleistungen, Abfall, Immissionsschutz und Arbeitssicherheit mit Ausbildung und Beratung
Key services
Dangerous goods law consulting, Hazardous substances compliance, Legal services, Waste management consulting, Immission control, Occupational safety, Training and education
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Real Cookie Banner Pro, Google Analytics (MonsterInsights), Google Maps, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (MonsterInsights)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  3. No terms of service page found.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, address, and contact form.
  5. Use of modern WordPress CMS with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins.
  6. Google Analytics and Google Maps integrated with user consent.
  7. Security headers and HTTPS enforced, indicating good security posture.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; content is business and compliance focused.
  9. No explicit incident response or security policy pages found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It employs modern web technologies including Google Fonts, Font Awesome icons, and Google Maps integration. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses Real Cookie Banner Pro for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured, contributing to a secure environment. There is no indication of outdated or vulnerable libraries. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and compliant online presence with room for improvement in accessibility and security transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gefahrgutjaeger.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gefahrgutjaeger.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.