Skip to main content

Security report for gedtrans.com

Gedtrans · Transportation · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gedtrans operates a specialized SaaS platform focused on transport document management, targeting transport subcontractors and orderers primarily in France and Europe. The platform facilitates the collection, verification, and real-time tracking of legal transport documents, helping clients comply with regulatory obligations and streamline their operational processes. With over 12,000 customers annually and a 5-year market presence, Gedtrans positions itself as a leader in its niche. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and jQuery, integrating essential tools such as Google reCAPTCHA for form security and Matomo for analytics. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and GDPR compliance through cookie consent mechanisms and a comprehensive privacy policy. From a security standpoint, the site enforces HTTPS and employs standard best practices, though it lacks explicit HTTP security headers and a published security policy or incident response plan. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain introduces a minor trust concern but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the professional presentation and business consistency. Overall, Gedtrans presents a secure, compliant, and professionally managed online presence suitable for its business domain, with recommendations to enhance security headers and incident response transparency to further strengthen trust and resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gedtrans.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gedtrans targets the transport and logistics sector with a SaaS model focused on document compliance and management. Its competitive advantage lies in its specialized platform that addresses a critical regulatory need for transport subcontractors and orderers. The company leverages partnerships with industry players and maintains a strong reference base, enhancing market credibility. Revenue streams likely include subscription fees for platform access. The business shows growth potential through its partner ecosystem and digital maturity, though domain registration opacity warrants monitoring. The company operates primarily in France with European reach, serving medium-sized enterprises and transport professionals.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, integration of Google reCAPTCHA to prevent automated abuse, and GDPR-compliant cookie consent. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No direct incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved by implementing recommended headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Consider obtaining and displaying relevant security certifications or compliance badges to strengthen trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
B2PWeb (Bourse Premium Professionnel Web)
Registration number
RCS Avignon B 489 052 902
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gedtrans
Description
GedTrans is a Transport Document Management platform that centralizes collection, verification, and tracking of legal transport documents such as company registration certificates, transport licenses, compliance proofs, certificates, and insurance. It aims to save time, improve processes, and ensure regulatory compliance for transport subcontractors and orderers.
Key services
Document collection, Verification and compliance tracking, Real-time document conformity checks, Sharing transport documents with orderers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Google reCAPTCHA, Matomo Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Contact Form 7, GDPR Cookie Compliance plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA integration on forms
  • GDPR cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GDPR plugin scripts)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, LinkedIn Insight
Marketing tools
Google Tag Manager (disabled container), LinkedIn Insight Tag, Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to transport document management.
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and GDPR compliance mechanisms.
  4. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a minor trust concern.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Contact information is present but no direct emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled found in HTML.
  7. Multiple partner and reference domains linked, indicating a strong partner ecosystem.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using Bootstrap for responsive design and jQuery for interactivity. It employs modern web fonts and iconography via Google Fonts and FontAwesome. Analytics are handled primarily through Matomo, supplemented by Google Analytics scripts managed via GDPR compliance plugins. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA for form protection and integrates LinkedIn Insight for marketing analytics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers, indicating areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified in the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gedtrans.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gedtrans.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.