Skip to main content

Security report for gedmouv.com

GedMouv · Transportation · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GedMouv is a specialized B2B platform offering shared traceability solutions for the transport and logistics industry, enabling real-time data exchange and delivery tracking among customers, carriers, and drivers. The company operates under the parent entity B2PWeb and targets transport companies, freight forwarders, and shippers primarily in France. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and slick carousel, and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, though improvements in HTTP security headers and explicit security policies are recommended. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, but the overall business presence and content quality support a trustworthy profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gedmouv.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GedMouv occupies a niche in the transport traceability market, leveraging digitalization trends to offer flexible e-CMR management, ETA tracking, and geo-tracking services. Its business model is SaaS-based, focusing on improving operational productivity and customer satisfaction for transport operators. The company maintains strategic partnerships with industry players such as Renault Trucks and AS24, enhancing its ecosystem. Customer testimonials and references indicate positive market reception. The company appears small but established since 2014, with a clear focus on transport and energy sectors. The partnership ecosystem and digital maturity suggest growth potential and competitive advantage in logistics traceability.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level, with HTTPS enforced and reCAPTCHA protecting forms. GDPR compliance is evident through cookie consent banners and detailed privacy policies. However, the lack of visible HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a risk factor that should be addressed to enhance trust. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
B2PWeb (Bourse Premium Professionnel Web)
Registration number
RCS Avignon B 489 052 902
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GedMouv
Description
GedMouv is a shared traceability solution designed to connect players in the transport and logistics sector, enabling seamless data exchange and real-time tracking of deliveries.
Key services
Order transmission and management, Driver assignment, Real-time delivery tracking and reporting, Geo-tracking and ETA management, e-CMR management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics, reCAPTCHA, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner with GDPR compliance
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Matomo
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to transport traceability.
  3. Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  4. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  5. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy but not conclusive.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and marketing tools with consent mechanisms.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. Mobile optimization and SEO are good.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and slick carousel for sliders. It uses Google Fonts and FontAwesome for typography and icons. Analytics are implemented via Google Analytics and Matomo, with Google Tag Manager managing tags. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information. The technical implementation is solid but could be improved by adding accessibility enhancements and security headers. The site uses reCAPTCHA for bot protection on forms, indicating attention to security. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for modernization in security and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gedmouv.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gedmouv.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.