Skip to main content

Security report for gedimino37.lt

Gedimino37 · Real Estate · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gedimino37 is a Lithuanian real estate project focused on revitalizing two buildings located at Gedimino pr. 37. The website serves as a platform to showcase the apartments available for sale, provide project information, and facilitate contact with brokers. The target audience primarily includes local real estate buyers and investors interested in residential properties in Lithuania. The business model revolves around direct sales of apartments within the project. The website is built using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity and a focus on user experience. The site is mobile optimized and provides a clean, professional design with clear navigation. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and includes a cookie consent banner, demonstrating compliance with basic privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, there is a lack of explicit security policies, incident response information, and security headers, which suggests room for improvement in security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy, but the presence of consistent contact information and privacy policies supports a moderate trust level. Overall, the website presents a professional and functional real estate project portal with good content quality and business credibility. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security measures and accessibility improvements. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing terms of service, and enhancing incident response readiness to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gedimino37.lt

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
40
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gedimino37.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gedimino37.lt right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gedimino37 operates in the Lithuanian real estate sector, focusing on residential apartment sales within a specific urban redevelopment project. The company leverages direct sales through brokers, targeting local buyers and investors. The website acts as a marketing and informational tool rather than a transactional platform. The business appears small in scale with no indication of parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership with Rebaltic, as indicated by broker email domains, suggests collaboration with a real estate agency or developer. The lack of social media presence and external marketing tools indicates a focused but limited digital marketing strategy. Growth potential may depend on expanding digital outreach and enhancing online trust signals. The business model is straightforward, relying on showcasing property and facilitating direct contact with sales agents.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a visible cookie consent mechanism, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The contact form collects user data but lacks visible anti-spam or input validation indicators. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were detected, minimizing privacy risks. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by adopting standard security headers, publishing security policies, and implementing stronger data protection measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a terms of service page and explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish dedicated security contact channels and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy to foster trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gedimino37
Description
Naujam gyvenimui prikeliami du pastatai - Gedimino pr. 37 gatvės korpusas ir kiemo korpusas.
Key services
Apartment sales, Real estate project information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Swiper.js
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented and visible.
  4. Contact information includes two brokers with phone numbers and emails under rebaltic.lt domain.
  5. No terms of service or explicit security/incident response policies found.
  6. Website uses modern Next.js framework and React with Swiper.js for UI.
  7. No external analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. No social media links found in the HTML content.
  9. Forms collect basic contact data with name, email, and message fields.
  10. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Next.js and React, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks for server-side rendering and client-side interactivity. Swiper.js is used for interactive UI elements such as sliders. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes a language switcher for Lithuanian and English. Performance appears moderate with deferred script loading and preloading of CSS assets. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly available. The absence of structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags limits SEO potential. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but could benefit from SEO enhancements and improved accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gedimino37.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gedimino37.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.