Skip to main content

Security report for gcrieber-shipping.com

GC Rieber Shipping · Transportation · Norway

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GC Rieber Shipping operates in the maritime transportation sector, providing shipping services likely targeted at business clients and partners. The company has an established online presence with a website built on WordPress, utilizing modern SEO tools such as Yoast SEO and analytics via Matomo, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The website design is professional and mobile-optimized, offering a good user experience and clear navigation. However, explicit business descriptions and detailed service information are limited in the provided content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie policy and consent mechanism present but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website reflects a legitimate and moderately mature business with room for improvement in transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gcrieber-shipping.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned in the transportation industry, specifically maritime shipping, with a domain age of over 17 years supporting business maturity. The business model appears service-oriented, focusing on shipping logistics. The website targets business clients and partners, though detailed market positioning and competitive advantages are not explicitly stated. The use of WordPress and SEO tools suggests an intent to maintain visibility and engagement. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified, and no direct contact information was found, which may limit direct customer engagement. The company is registered in Norway, consistent with the domain registrar and website language. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the provided data.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain transfer protection enabled, which are positive security indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided content, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found. The use of Matomo analytics suggests some privacy-conscious tracking practices. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing additional security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing clear security and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and transparency.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Add a security policy and incident response contact information, including abuse and security email addresses.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GC Rieber Shipping
Description
GC Rieber Shipping is a company operating in the shipping and transportation sector. The website indicates a focus on shipping services, likely maritime transport, but no detailed business description is provided in the extracted content.
Key services
shipping services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery, FontAwesome, WPBakery Page Builder
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • clientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally built WordPress site with SEO optimization.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage content.
  3. Cookie policy with consent mechanism is present.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. Use of Matomo analytics indicates some privacy-conscious tracking.
  7. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  8. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and consistency with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the WPBakery Page Builder and Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern and flexible technical infrastructure. It uses jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements and icons. Hosting and domain registration are managed by Domeneshop AS, a reputable Norwegian registrar. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization and basic accessibility features present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Tracking is done via Matomo, a privacy-focused analytics platform. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries in the provided content. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to improve overall security and resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gcrieber-shipping.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gcrieber-shipping.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.