Skip to main content

Security report for gartenkatalog.com

FULLHAUS GmbH · Retail · Germany

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.gartenkatalog.com is a professionally designed German-language platform operated by FULLHAUS GmbH, offering a free garden catalog for the 2025 season. It targets homeowners and garden enthusiasts in Germany, providing inspiration and connecting users with EUROBAUSTOFF Fachhändler, a cooperative of specialist dealers in house and garden products. The business model centers on catalog distribution and lead generation for these dealers. Technically, the site is built on TYPO3 CMS, employs Usercentrics for consent management, and uses Matomo for analytics, indicating a modern and privacy-conscious infrastructure. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and published security policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly, reducing domain trustworthiness despite the professional presentation and GDPR compliance. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy in content, but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration and enhanced security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Domain Expires Soon

      Domain expires in 23 days

      What to do: Renew domain registration before expiration

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gartenkatalog.com

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
100
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company FULLHAUS GmbH operates in the retail sector, focusing on garden and home improvement catalogs linked to the EUROBAUSTOFF cooperative. Their competitive advantage lies in localized specialist dealer connections and a niche catalog offering. The business model leverages free catalog distribution to generate leads for partner dealers. The target market is German homeowners interested in garden trends and products. The website's partnership with EUROBAUSTOFF enhances credibility and market reach. Growth potential exists in expanding digital engagement and improving direct customer interactions. The absence of detailed company founding data limits deeper historical analysis.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and consent management for GDPR compliance. However, it lacks explicit HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, and no published security or incident response policies are found. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which limits transparency for security researchers. The forms use client-side validation but no visible advanced protections against injection or abuse. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a catalog distribution site but could be improved to reduce risk and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Verify and correct WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance form security with server-side validation and anti-abuse mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FULLHAUS GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FULLHAUS GmbH
Description
FULLHAUS GmbH offers a garden catalog service featuring ideas and inspirations for garden design, including products like terrassendielen, zaunsysteme, and garden furniture. The site promotes ordering a free garden catalog for the 2025 season and connects customers with EUROBAUSTOFF Fachhändler (specialist dealers) for house and garden products.
Key services
Garden catalog distribution, Connecting customers to local specialist dealers
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Usercentrics Consent Management, Matomo Analytics (piwik.js)
Frameworks
TYPO3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical link https://)
  • Consent management via Usercentrics
  • Form validation with required fields

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented in German language targeting German customers.
  3. Uses TYPO3 CMS with modern consent management and analytics.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including company address, phone, email, and contact form.
  7. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses TYPO3 CMS, a robust and mature content management system, combined with Usercentrics for consent management and Matomo for privacy-focused analytics. The site is mobile optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design. No hosting provider information is directly available. The technical stack is modern and well integrated but lacks some security hardening measures. There is no evidence of legacy or vulnerable libraries. The site could benefit from improved security headers and enhanced transparency in domain registration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gartenkatalog.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gartenkatalog.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.