Skip to main content

Security report for garomfood.ro

S.C. GAROM FOOD S.R.L. · Retail · Romania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

S.C. GAROM FOOD S.R.L. operates as a regional distributor and retailer of canned fish, vegetables, fruits, and related food products in Romania. The company is part of the larger Gaston group, which has multiple regional partners across Central and Eastern Europe. The website presents a professional image with clear branding and product focus, targeting general consumers and business clients interested in quality food products. The business model centers on distribution and retail within the food sector, leveraging established brand partnerships.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching garomfood.ro

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a stable market position as a small-sized regional distributor within the Gaston group ecosystem. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a diverse portfolio of branded canned fish and food products. The website links to multiple partner domains, indicating a well-integrated partnership network. The business targets retail and wholesale customers in Romania, with potential growth opportunities through digital presence enhancement and expanded product offerings.

Security posture

The website employs basic security measures such as cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and uses multiple versions of jQuery, which may introduce vulnerabilities. No HTTPS status was confirmed from the HTML content alone, and no explicit privacy or security policies are published. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, indicating a low to moderate security maturity level. The business should prioritize consolidating scripts, implementing security headers, and publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a strong SSL/TLS configuration and verify its presence site-wide.
  2. Consolidate jQuery versions to a single, updated version to reduce security risks.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and security policies accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance security culture and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
S.C. GAROM FOOD S.R.L.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
S.C. GAROM FOOD S.R.L.
Description
Gaston je distributor konzerovaných ryb, zeleniny, ovoce pod značkami Gianna, Franz Josef, Marina aj.
Key services
Distribution of canned fish, Distribution of vegetables and fruits, Retail of branded food products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery 3.2.1, jQuery UI 1.11.4, bxSlider, picturefill, colorbox, headroom.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is privacy protected by ROTLD with no public registrant info.
  3. Website uses multiple versions of jQuery which may pose security risks.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented but no explicit privacy policy page found.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer with email, phone, and physical address.
  6. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. Website content is focused on food distribution and retail with no adult or questionable content.
  8. External links mostly point to related Gaston group domains and brand partners.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
  10. No forms detected on the homepage HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy and mixed jQuery stack (versions 1.12.4 and 3.2.1) alongside jQuery UI and plugins like bxSlider and colorbox. The site is moderately optimized for mobile with responsive images and a slider. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements by modernizing the tech stack and optimizing script loading. Accessibility is basic, with skip links and some ARIA roles but no advanced features detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with garomfood.ro. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review garomfood.ro.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.