Skip to main content

Security report for gambleaware.co.uk

GambleAware · Non-profit · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GambleAware is a UK-based non-profit organization dedicated to providing free, confidential advice and support for individuals affected by gambling addiction. The website serves as a resource hub offering tools, information, and guidance to those worried about their own or others' gambling behaviors. Positioned as a trusted entity in the responsible gambling sector, GambleAware targets individuals and families seeking help and education on gambling-related issues. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for consent management, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices. The use of Cookiebot ensures GDPR compliance with granular cookie consent options, enhancing user privacy. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security in the provided data. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The absence of a security.txt or public incident response policy suggests room for improvement in transparency and security communication. Overall, GambleAware presents a professional, trustworthy online presence with strong privacy and compliance focus. The lack of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is typical for non-profits and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing vulnerability disclosure and incident response information, and providing clearer contact details to improve user trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gambleaware.co.uk

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gambleaware.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gambleaware.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GambleAware operates as a non-profit organization focused on gambling addiction awareness and support within the UK. Its market positioning is strong in the responsible gambling domain, leveraging partnerships with major platforms and advertising networks for outreach. The business model centers on education, support services, and public awareness rather than commercial revenue. The website's integration with major ad networks and tracking services indicates a balanced approach to funding and outreach while maintaining user privacy through consent management. Growth indicators include comprehensive content and modern technology adoption. The partnership ecosystem includes major social media and analytics providers, though no direct business partners or subsidiaries were identified in the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and a robust cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security score. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The absence of a public security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure channel limits transparency and readiness perception. Overall, the security maturity is appropriate for a non-profit but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and publishing security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and a public vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Develop and make publicly available an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility with verified company emails and phone numbers to improve user trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and ensure compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GambleAware
Description
Free, confidential advice, tools and support for anyone who’s worried about their – or someone else’s – gambling. If gambling’s on your mind, we’re here to help.
Key services
Gambling help and support, Addiction advice, Educational resources
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, jQuery Validate, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Gleap SDK
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Twitter tracking, Reddit pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism implemented via Cookiebot.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content provided.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or query failure.
  5. Strong focus on user privacy and GDPR compliance.
  6. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools.
  7. No visible security headers detected in the provided data; recommend adding.
  8. No terms of service page clearly identified.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack featuring jQuery 3.6.0, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot for consent management, and Gleap SDK for feedback or support. The site loads external fonts from Adobe Typekit and Google Fonts, and scripts from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and preconnect hints to optimize resource fetching. Mobile optimization and accessibility are good, with responsive design and semantic HTML elements. No CMS was explicitly detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the data. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced further by tightening security headers and monitoring third-party dependencies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gambleaware.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gambleaware.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.