Skip to main content

Security report for galio.lt

Galio group · Real Estate · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Galio group is a real estate development company focused on delivering new apartments and office spaces primarily in Vilnius, Lithuania, and also operating in Latvia. The company positions itself as a leading developer of business centers in the Baltic region, emphasizing quality, sustainability, and innovative living and working spaces. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive project information, news updates, and a strong emphasis on sustainability certifications such as BREEAM. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Adform, indicating a data-driven approach to user engagement and marketing. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though some security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust verification but the professional presentation and detailed content suggest a legitimate and established business. Overall, the website is well-optimized for SEO, mobile-friendly, and provides clear contact information, supporting a positive user experience and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching galio.lt

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Galio group operates in the real estate sector, targeting residential buyers and commercial tenants in Lithuania and Latvia. Their business model centers on property development and leasing, with a portfolio of multiple ongoing projects and a focus on sustainable building practices. The company leverages certifications like BREEAM to enhance market positioning and appeal to environmentally conscious clients. Their digital ecosystem integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools to optimize customer acquisition and retention. The company maintains active communication channels and regularly publishes news, indicating a transparent and engaged corporate culture. While WHOIS data is not available, the domain and website content align with a medium-sized real estate developer with a strong regional presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. Multiple third-party tracking scripts are used, which necessitates ongoing vigilance to prevent privacy leaks or vulnerabilities. The site lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Forms appear to be minimal and likely secured by WordPress backend standards, but explicit CSRF or input validation details are not visible. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly disclosed, which is a common gap but could be improved to enhance trust. Overall, the security posture is good but could benefit from additional hardening and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust with users and partners.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and providing granular cookie management options.
  5. Consider WHOIS privacy transparency or provide domain registration details on the website to strengthen legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Galio group
Description
Parduodami nauji butai Vilniuje ir patalpos biurams verslo centruose: apgalvotas išplanavimas, patogi infrastruktūra. Pažangios erdvės gyvenimui ir darbui.
Key services
new apartments sales in Vilnius, office space leasing, real estate project development
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Adform tracking, Swiper.js, noUiSlider
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies (PHPSESSID cookie)
  • Consent mechanism for cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Adform
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Adform tracking
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong focus on real estate development in Lithuania and Latvia
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policy with consent mechanism
  4. Use of multiple third-party analytics and advertising services
  5. No visible security or content blocking issues
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 with Yoast SEO plugin, indicating a modern CMS environment optimized for search engines. It uses popular JavaScript libraries such as Swiper.js for UI components and noUiSlider for interactive elements. Tracking and analytics are implemented via Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, and Adform, reflecting a comprehensive marketing stack. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and scalable web presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with galio.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review galio.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.