Skip to main content

Security report for gaia.se

Gaia System AB · Transportation · Sweden

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gaia System AB specializes in providing advanced digital solutions for public transport, including a cloud-based real-time platform and an online vehicle platform that enhance traffic and passenger information management. Recently acquired by Axentia Group, Gaia is positioned as a niche player focused on integrating real-time data and AI-driven services for transport authorities, operators, and passengers. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, customer testimonials, and clear business messaging. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and includes robust security measures such as HTTPS, reCAPTCHA, and consent management. Privacy compliance is well addressed with detailed policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, Gaia exhibits a strong security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected, supporting its credibility and trustworthiness in the transportation technology sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gaia.se

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gaia operates in the transportation sector, targeting public transport authorities, operators, and vehicle technology partners. Its business model revolves around SaaS platforms and consulting services focused on real-time data integration, digital twins, and AI analytics. The recent acquisition by Axentia Group suggests strategic growth and market consolidation. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a professional brand image supported by client testimonials and press coverage. Revenue streams likely include software subscriptions, consulting, and platform integrations. The website content and structure indicate a focus on scalability, flexibility, and future-proofing transport services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and implements key security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities. Forms are protected with Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse. The presence of a consent management platform (CookieHub) ensures compliance with GDPR cookie regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the site lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response page, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. Overall, Gaia demonstrates a solid security foundation appropriate for its business domain.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information to improve transparency.
  2. Implement a formal vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance form validation and monitoring to prevent abuse and data leakage.
  5. Continue to maintain and update privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms in line with evolving regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Gaia System AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gaia System AB
Description
Gaia offers products and services for public transport, including a cloud-based real-time platform for traffic and information management and an online vehicle platform providing intelligent services to passengers and drivers.
Key services
Next generation real-time platform, Online vehicle platform, Consulting services in Data & AI, Passenger information systems, Driver assistance and mobile apps
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Avada Theme, Gravity Forms, jQuery, Google reCAPTCHA, CookieHub CMP, Google Analytics, Hotjar
Frameworks
Avada, Gravity Forms
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Consent management via CookieHub
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and navigation.
  2. Strong focus on public transport digital solutions and real-time data platforms.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and press releases enhance trust.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management implemented.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided including physical addresses, emails, phone, and forms.
  7. No signs of blocking, malware, or suspicious activity detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and Gravity Forms plugin, indicating a mature CMS environment. It integrates modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Google reCAPTCHA for enhanced user interaction and security. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema for website and FAQ content. The site uses CookieHub for consent management and Google Analytics and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. No major technical debt or outdated technologies were observed, though hosting provider details are not explicit.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gaia.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gaia.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.