Skip to main content

Security report for gafood.hu

GA FOOD Kft. · Retail · Hungary

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

GA FOOD Kft. is a Hungarian company specializing in the distribution of premium and exotic food products, including seafood, fruits, vegetables, oils, and specialty items. It operates as part of the Gaston Group, which includes multiple partner brands and domains, positioning itself as a medium-sized player in the retail food sector. The website provides clear business contact information and brand consistency, targeting both general consumers and business clients interested in quality food products. Technically, the website uses multiple versions of jQuery and several JavaScript libraries to enhance user experience, but lacks modern security practices such as HTTPS and security headers. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, but no privacy policy or terms of service pages are found, indicating gaps in compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and protect users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gafood.hu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention gafood.hu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for gafood.hu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company benefits from being part of the Gaston Group, leveraging a network of partner sites and brands to offer a diverse product portfolio. Its business model focuses on wholesale and distribution of premium food products, targeting both retail and business customers. The presence of multiple external domains linked as partners indicates a collaborative ecosystem. However, the lack of detailed business registration data and certifications on the site limits full transparency. The company appears to maintain moderate market positioning with consistent branding and a clear product focus. Growth opportunities may exist by enhancing digital presence and compliance.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security posture due to the absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and loading of multiple jQuery versions which may introduce vulnerabilities. While a cookie consent banner is present, the absence of privacy and security policies, as well as incident response contacts, indicates limited readiness for security incidents and compliance requirements. No visible vulnerabilities such as exposed credentials or malicious scripts were detected, but the technical debt and missing security best practices pose risks. Immediate improvements in SSL implementation and security headers are recommended to protect user data and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Consolidate and update JavaScript libraries to a single, secure version to reduce vulnerability risks.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and transparency.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Establish and publish incident response contact information and consider implementing a security.txt file.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
GA FOOD Kft.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GA FOOD Kft.
Description
GA FOOD Kft. is a Hungarian company offering premium and exotic food products including tuna, fish and seafood, fruits, vegetables, olives, oils and vinegars, pasta and rice, and specialities. It is part of the Gaston Group with multiple brands and partner sites.
Key services
Distribution of premium food products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery 3.2.1, jQuery UI 1.11.4, bxSlider, picturefill, colorbox, headroom.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and visible.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
  5. Multiple external partner domains linked, consistent with Gaston Group branding.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS usage detected, indicating potential security risks.
  7. Multiple versions of jQuery loaded, which may cause conflicts or vulnerabilities.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  9. Website content is professional and relevant to food distribution business.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mix of jQuery versions (1.12.4 and 3.2.1), jQuery UI, bxSlider, picturefill, colorbox, and headroom.js to provide interactive and responsive features. The site appears to be custom-built or uses an unknown CMS, with no explicit CMS detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data present. However, the lack of HTTPS and security headers, along with multiple JavaScript versions, indicates technical debt and potential security risks. Modernization efforts should focus on security hardening and streamlining the tech stack.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gafood.hu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gafood.hu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.