Skip to main content

Security report for fyeg.org

Young European Greens · Non-profit · Belgium

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Young European Greens is a European non-profit youth political organization focused on green and progressive activism. The organization operates a well-structured website hosted on Squarespace, providing information about its campaigns, events, and member organizations. The technical infrastructure is modern and leverages standard web technologies and third-party services such as Google Tag Manager and social media integrations. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and HSTS enabled, though DNSSEC is not implemented. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. No contact emails or phone numbers are explicitly provided on the site, which may impact user trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fyeg.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization positions itself as a key player in European youth green politics, leveraging a network of member organizations and campaigns focused on social justice, climate, and animal rights. Its business model is non-profit, relying on donations and member support. The website serves as a communication and advocacy platform targeting young Europeans interested in environmental and social issues. The presence on multiple social media platforms indicates an active engagement strategy. The domain age and registration data support the organization's legitimacy and long-standing presence in the sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with HSTS, ensuring encrypted communications and protection against protocol downgrade attacks. The domain status clientTransferProhibited adds a layer of domain hijacking protection. However, the lack of DNSSEC leaves DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing. No explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, indicating room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager and ShareThis introduces moderate tracking but no evident vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced with additional policies and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to obtain user consent for tracking and cookies.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Include explicit contact information such as official emails and phone numbers on the website.
  6. Conduct an accessibility audit and improve features to enhance inclusivity.
  7. Regularly review third-party scripts for vulnerabilities and privacy impact.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Young European Greens
Description
Young European Greens is a non-profit political youth organization focused on green politics and activism across Europe. It represents young green activists and member organizations, promoting social justice, climate action, animal rights, and other progressive causes.
Key services
Political advocacy, Campaigns on social justice, climate, animal rights, Events and training, Publications and communications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace CMS, JavaScript, Typekit Fonts, Google Tag Manager
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • HSTS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager), ShareThis
Marketing tools
ShareThis social sharing
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established non-profit youth political organization.
  2. Content is focused on green politics and activism.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the site.
  4. Uses Squarespace CMS with standard third-party scripts.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence is strong with official accounts on Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and TikTok.
  7. Security posture is good with HTTPS and HSTS but lacks DNSSEC.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  9. No explicit GDPR compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent banners.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Squarespace CMS, utilizing modern web standards including responsive design and web fonts via Typekit. Performance is moderate, with standard optimizations but some reliance on multiple external scripts. SEO is basic with proper meta tags and Open Graph data but lacks advanced SEO features. Accessibility is basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or enhanced features detected. The hosting provider is Squarespace, which offers reliable uptime and security features. The domain is registered with CPS-Datensysteme GmbH since 2001, indicating a mature and stable web presence. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fyeg.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fyeg.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.