Skip to main content

Security report for futurewings.lv

SIA "Future Wings" · Transportation · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

66/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "Future Wings" is a specialized helicopter service provider based in Latvia, offering heliport services, maintenance, refuelling, parking, airfield operations, and pilot training. The company positions itself as one of the first specialized helicopter service centers in the Baltic region with over 15 years of experience, targeting aviation companies and private helicopter owners. The website reflects a professional business model focused on transportation services with a clear market niche. Technically, the website is built on the MonoSite platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and hCaptcha for spam protection. It integrates Google Analytics for user tracking and employs external CDNs for fonts and scripts. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and a clear navigation structure, although accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses hCaptcha on its contact form, demonstrating attention to spam and bot mitigation. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image with clear business information and contact details. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain registration verification, but the business legitimacy is supported by membership in the Latvian Security and Defence Federation and consistent website content. Strategic improvements in security headers and incident response transparency would enhance the security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching futurewings.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
66

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Future Wings operates in the niche helicopter services market in Latvia and the Baltic region, serving both corporate aviation clients and private helicopter owners. Their competitive advantage lies in their specialized focus and long-standing experience. Revenue streams likely include heliport services, maintenance contracts, pilot training fees, and related aviation operations. The company maintains partnerships with local federations and digital service providers, indicating a growing digital maturity. The website's integration of digital security grants suggests ongoing investment in technology. The target customer segments are aviation companies requiring heliport and maintenance services and individuals seeking pilot training. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with a focused regional presence and a professional online presence supporting business growth.

Security posture

The security maturity of Future Wings' website is moderate. The use of HTTPS and hCaptcha indicates baseline security measures. The cookie consent banner with opt-in functionality aligns with privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The absence of a security.txt file or dedicated security contact reduces transparency. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish a security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Future Wings"
Registration number
40203506411
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Future Wings"
Description
Helicopter services, maintenance, and pilot training in Latvia, with state-of-the-art facilities and expert staff.
Key services
Heliport services, Refuelling, Maintenance, Parking, Airfield Operations, Pilot School
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, hCaptcha, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, CSS Fonts CDN, MonoSite platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • hCaptcha used on contact form
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with opt-in consent are implemented.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
  4. Use of hCaptcha on forms enhances spam protection.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; limits domain trust verification.
  6. Website uses modern web technologies and external CDNs for fonts and scripts.
  7. Social media presence on TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram is linked.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  9. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  10. Business is a member of a recognized Latvian federation, adding trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the MonoSite platform, leveraging JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and hCaptcha for functionality and spam protection. External CDNs are used for fonts and scripts, which can improve load times but require trust in third-party providers. Google Analytics is integrated for user behavior tracking. The site is mobile responsive with a clean design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph tags and JSON-LD structured data for local business. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and prefetching of key pages. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security headers and improved accessibility compliance to reduce technical debt and risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with futurewings.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review futurewings.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.