Skip to main content

Security report for funraise.io

Funraise · Non-profit · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Funraise is a SaaS company providing a comprehensive nonprofit fundraising platform designed to simplify donor management and fundraising activities. Their platform includes a wide array of features such as donation forms, peer-to-peer fundraising, event ticketing, donor CRM, automated communications, and AI-powered tools. Positioned as an easy-to-use and innovative solution, Funraise targets nonprofit organizations seeking to enhance their fundraising capabilities and donor engagement. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content tailored to nonprofit users. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and leverages modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity, and reCAPTCHA for analytics, marketing, and security. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with strong SEO and accessibility considerations. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security standpoint, Funraise demonstrates a solid posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of a public vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information suggests areas for improvement in transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive privacy policy and GDPR-aligned cookie consent. Overall, Funraise presents a trustworthy and professional online presence suitable for its nonprofit audience. The lack of WHOIS data due to privacy protection does not detract from the legitimacy indicated by the website's quality and security measures. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security transparency and incident response communications to further build trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching funraise.io

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
60
Email security
100
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention funraise.io, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
25
Employees
0
Customers
25
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for funraise.io.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Funraise operates in the nonprofit technology sector, offering fundraising and donor management software as a service. Their market positioning emphasizes ease of use and comprehensive functionality tailored to nonprofit organizations. The business model is subscription-based SaaS, targeting medium-sized nonprofits and foundations. Key revenue streams likely include tiered subscription plans and add-on services such as AI features and integrations. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with integrations to popular tools and platforms. Growth indicators include active content marketing (blog, webinars, podcast), educational resources (Funraise University), and a robust feature set addressing multiple fundraising use cases. The absence of explicit company founding year or parent company information limits deeper corporate intelligence. Nonetheless, the brand is consistent and professional, with clear messaging and trust signals.

Security posture

Funraise exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced site-wide, comprehensive security headers, and use of reCAPTCHA to protect forms. The presence of a dedicated security page indicates organizational attention to security practices. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is evident through GDPR-aligned cookie consent and a detailed privacy policy. However, the lack of a public vulnerability disclosure program or security incident contact information represents a compliance gap and potential risk in incident handling. The website does not expose WHOIS registrant details, likely due to privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by adding explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a public vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email addresses) on the security page.
  3. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain compliance with evolving regulations.
  4. Enhance transparency by providing more detailed company information such as founding year and legal entity details.
  5. Continue monitoring third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Funraise
Description
Funraise makes nonprofit fundraising a piece of cake. With truly innovative features and tools, fundraising is easier than ever. Power up your nonprofit.
Key services
Donation Forms, Donation Pages, Recurring Giving, Fundraising Websites, Peer-to-peer Fundraising, Events & Ticketing, Auctions, Company Matching, Donor CRM, Wealth Screening
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot, Intercom, Microsoft Clarity, Amazon CloudFront, Lottie animations, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow Hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, HubSpot Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Intercom, Salesloft
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected
  2. Professional and consistent branding and design
  3. Comprehensive nonprofit fundraising platform with many features
  4. Strong privacy and cookie consent mechanisms in place
  5. Use of multiple modern analytics and marketing tools
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed, only contact forms
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, likely due to privacy protection or query error
  8. No explicit security incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure policy found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies and third-party services for analytics, marketing, and user engagement. The use of Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, HubSpot, and Microsoft Clarity indicates a sophisticated approach to data collection and user behavior analysis. Performance is optimized with CDN delivery (CloudFront) and asynchronous script loading. Mobile optimization and accessibility are well-implemented, supporting a broad user base. The technical infrastructure is robust and scalable, suitable for a SaaS platform serving nonprofits. Opportunities exist to further modernize by adopting automated security scanning and integrating continuous compliance monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with funraise.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review funraise.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.