Skip to main content

Security report for fundraisingregulator.org.uk

Fundraising Regulator · Non-profit · United Kingdom

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Fundraising Regulator website serves as the official online presence for the independent regulator of charitable fundraising in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. It provides comprehensive information about fundraising standards, complaint handling, registration services, and the Code of Fundraising Practice. The organization positions itself as a trusted authority aiming to improve fundraising standards and build public trust. The site targets charities, fundraisers, donors, and the general public interested in ethical fundraising practices. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user experience insights. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with clear navigation and professional design. Privacy and cookie policies are prominently implemented with consent mechanisms, reflecting good compliance with GDPR and related regulations. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent banners but lacks explicit security headers and a published security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data query for the www subdomain failed due to domain naming rules, but this does not detract from the legitimacy of the main domain and organization. Overall, the Fundraising Regulator website demonstrates a strong security posture, excellent content quality, and good privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to further strengthen trust and security maturity.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fundraisingregulator.org.uk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 58 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

Keep watching fundraisingregulator.org.uk

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
70
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fundraisingregulator.org.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fundraisingregulator.org.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Fundraising Regulator operates as an essential non-profit regulatory entity within the UK charity sector. It holds a unique market position as the independent overseer of fundraising standards, providing services such as complaint investigations, registration, and certification via the Fundraising Badge. The organization likely derives funding from registered charities and stakeholders, focusing on maintaining public trust and ethical fundraising practices. The website reflects a mature digital presence with active social media engagement and published corporate reports, indicating transparency and accountability. The absence of direct revenue-generating services suggests a regulatory business model rather than commercial operations. The organization’s partnerships and ecosystem appear focused on the charity sector, with no commercial subsidiaries or related domains identified.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS encryption and a cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents an area for improvement. No security.txt or incident response contact information is published, which could hinder vulnerability reporting and incident management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected, and forms appear secure with no obvious injection points. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve communication with security researchers.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure no privacy or security risks are introduced.
  5. Enhance monitoring and logging capabilities to detect and respond to potential security incidents promptly.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fundraising Regulator
Registration number
10016446
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fundraising Regulator
Description
The Fundraising Regulator is the independent regulator of charitable fundraising in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It was established following the Etherington review to strengthen charity regulation and restore public trust.
Key services
Complaints and investigations, Fundraising Badge, Registering organisations, Fundraising Preference Service, Proactive regulation, Code of Fundraising Practice
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is comprehensive, professional, and well-structured.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. No security.txt or explicit security policy found.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to invalid domain query but does not impact legitimacy.
  6. Multiple social media channels actively linked.
  7. Drupal CMS used with modern version (Drupal 10).
  8. Good mobile and accessibility support.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, a modern and widely supported CMS platform, indicating up-to-date infrastructure. It uses Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking, which are industry-standard tools. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles, reflecting good technical implementation. Performance appears moderate with deferred and async script loading. The lack of visible hosting provider information limits deeper infrastructure analysis. Overall, the technical stack is robust and suitable for the organization's needs, with opportunities to improve security headers and incident response capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 83/100 +2Low26 findingsView report
  2. 81/100Low22 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fundraisingregulator.org.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fundraisingregulator.org.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.