Skip to main content

Security report for fundingcentre.com.au

Funding Centre · Non-profit · Australia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Funding Centre is an Australian-based organization providing a comprehensive grants database and fundraising capacity building services primarily targeting not-for-profits, schools, businesses, government entities, and individuals. The website offers subscription-based membership plans granting access to a rich database of live grants, fundraising tools, and resources, positioning itself as a leading platform in the Australian fundraising ecosystem with over 20 years of experience. The parent company, Our Community, supports the platform, enhancing its credibility and market presence. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Bootstrap 4, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA v3, and Google Tag Manager, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience across devices. The site demonstrates good SEO practices and moderate performance, with room for improvement in accessibility and explicit security header implementation. From a security standpoint, the site enforces HTTPS and integrates bot protection via reCAPTCHA. However, it lacks explicit security headers and a visible security or incident response policy. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy hosted on the parent domain, but no cookie consent mechanism is present. WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is typical for such organizations, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the website presents a professional, trustworthy, and functional platform with moderate technical maturity and a solid business model. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would enhance its risk posture and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fundingcentre.com.au

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
70
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Funding Centre operates in the non-profit sector, focusing on providing fundraising and grant search services to Australian not-for-profits, schools, and related entities. Its subscription-based business model offers tiered membership plans catering to different user needs, including single and multi-user options. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive grants database, fundraising tools, and integration with AI grant writing assistance. The parent company, Our Community, strengthens its market position and resource base. The organization maintains active social media channels and offers customized newsletters, enhancing engagement and customer retention. Growth indicators include the addition of AI tools and council-specific portals. The partnership ecosystem includes Our Community and related domains, supporting a robust operational framework.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA v3 integrated to mitigate automated abuse. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in defense-in-depth. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but lacking cookie consent mechanisms. The WHOIS data is privacy-protected, which is appropriate for the business type. Overall, the security posture is sound but could benefit from enhanced header implementation, published security policies, and improved privacy controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and preparedness.
  4. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy compliance measures, including data retention policies and GDPR adherence.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Funding Centre
Description
FundingCentre.com.au is where not-for-profits go for everything they need to become champion fundraisers.
Key services
Grants database and search, Fundraising tools and resources, Membership plans, Customised newsletters and alerts, Grant management dashboard, AI grant writing partner (Drafter), Grants portal for councils (SmartySearch)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Bootstrap 4, FontAwesome, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 for bot protection
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and clear navigation
  2. Strong focus on Australian not-for-profits and fundraising services
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or footer
  4. Privacy policy is linked on a related domain (ourcommunity.com.au)
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner detected despite use of Google reCAPTCHA and tracking
  6. Multiple membership plans clearly described with pricing
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn
  8. Use of modern web technologies and security best practices
  9. No visible security or privacy policy pages on main domain
  10. WHOIS data is not publicly available, indicating privacy protection
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies such as Bootstrap 4 for responsive design, FontAwesome for icons, and integrates Google services including reCAPTCHA v3 and Google Tag Manager for analytics and bot protection. The HTML structure is valid and semantic, supporting good SEO and accessibility practices, though accessibility could be improved. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. The site lacks a detected CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The technical stack supports a professional user experience but could be enhanced by adding progressive web app features and improving accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fundingcentre.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fundingcentre.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.