Skip to main content

Security report for fundacionglobalnature.org

Fundación Global Nature · Non-profit · Spain

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fundación Global Nature is a well-established Spanish non-profit organization dedicated since 1993 to the conservation of nature and ecosystem functionality. The organization provides technical guidance, publishes environmental reports, and runs biodiversity protection projects. Their website reflects a mature digital presence built on WordPress with modern plugins supporting donations and event management. The site targets environmental stakeholders, companies interested in biodiversity, and the general public. The organization maintains a consistent brand and professional content quality, supporting its credibility in the non-profit environmental sector. Technically, the website uses a robust WordPress infrastructure with Elementor, WooCommerce, and GiveWP plugins. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Hosting is provided by Dinahosting s.l., with a domain age consistent with the organization's history. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and has domain status protections but lacks DNSSEC and some recommended security headers. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. Cookie consent and privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, reflecting good privacy compliance. No critical vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. Overall, Fundación Global Nature's website presents a trustworthy, professional, and compliant digital front for a medium-sized non-profit organization. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, and incident response transparency would enhance their security posture and trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fundacionglobalnature.org

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
76
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fundación Global Nature occupies a stable position in the environmental non-profit sector in Spain, leveraging over 30 years of experience. Their business model centers on conservation projects, technical consultancy for biodiversity integration in companies, and dissemination of environmental knowledge. Revenue streams likely include donations facilitated by integrated GiveWP donation forms. The target audience includes environmental organizations, corporate partners, and the general public interested in nature conservation. The organization demonstrates a consistent branding strategy and maintains a professional online presence. Partnerships with social media platforms and use of marketing tools indicate active engagement with stakeholders. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operational structure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain registration protections are in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and common security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected, representing areas for improvement. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published, limiting transparency in incident response. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies are well implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a non-profit but could be strengthened by adopting additional best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a security.txt file detailing security policies and incident response contacts.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fundación Global Nature
Description
Desde 1993 dedicados a la conservación de la naturaleza y la funcionalidad de los ecosistemas
Key services
Biodiversity protection projects, Technical guidance for integrating biodiversity in companies, Publication and dissemination of environmental reports and studies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, GiveWP, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, jQuery, Swiper
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Twitter Ads
Marketing tools
Metricool
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a well-established non-profit focused on nature conservation
  2. Content is primarily in Spanish with English alternate available
  3. Uses modern WordPress ecosystem with multiple plugins for donations and events
  4. Cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are implemented
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content
  6. No visible security.txt or incident response information
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected
  8. Good SEO and social media integration
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor for page building, WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities, and GiveWP for donation management. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, and Twitter Ads. The hosting provider is Dinahosting s.l., with domain registration dating back to 2000, indicating a stable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic, suggesting room for improvement. The site uses modern web technologies such as jQuery, Swiper, and various WordPress plugins, reflecting a contemporary but standard technical stack for non-profit organizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fundacionglobalnature.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fundacionglobalnature.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.