Skip to main content

Security report for fullforcelogistics.com

FullForce Logistics Limited · Transportation · United Kingdom

Partial score · DNS & email only

69/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FullForce Logistics Limited is a UK-based logistics and haulage company operating from a 3-acre site in Coventry, Warwickshire. The company offers a range of services including haulage, pallet distribution, full and part load solutions, general haulage, line haul, and warehousing. It operates a modern fleet of vehicles ranging from 7.5t to 44t tractor units and serves businesses requiring efficient transportation and storage solutions. The company is part of a group with subsidiaries such as Matthew Kibble Transport and Shakespeare Transport, indicating a well-established regional presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using popular plugins like Slider Revolution and Contact Form 7, with Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented for spam protection on contact forms. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices, though some accessibility features could be improved. Hosting details are not explicitly available, but the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA, but lacks several security headers and does not publish a security or incident response policy. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with a GDPR policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business front, but the absence of WHOIS data and domain registration details reduces trustworthiness. It is recommended to verify domain registration and enhance security and privacy disclosures to improve credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fullforcelogistics.com

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
69

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FullForce Logistics Limited positions itself as a reliable regional logistics provider with a diversified service portfolio catering to various transportation and warehousing needs. The company leverages its group structure to offer comprehensive logistics solutions. Its competitive advantages include a modern vehicle fleet, 7-day operations, and partnerships with recognized industry networks such as Pallet Force and the Road Haulage Association (RHA). The business model focuses on B2B logistics services, targeting manufacturers, distributors, and retailers in the UK. The presence of job and account application forms suggests ongoing growth and customer acquisition efforts. The website's linkage to partner portals and group companies indicates a collaborative ecosystem enhancing service delivery and operational efficiency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and Google reCAPTCHA protecting contact forms against spam. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to clickjacking, MIME sniffing, and other web-based attacks. No security or incident response policies are published, limiting transparency and preparedness communication. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file further reduces the site's security posture. Privacy compliance is partial, with GDPR policy presence but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site is secure enough for general business use but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to minimize vulnerability exposure.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FullForce Logistics Limited
Description
Operating from our site in Coventry, Warwickshire, we operate a modern fleet of vehicles ranging from 7.5t to 44t tractor units.
Key services
Haulage, Pallet Distribution, Full & Part Load Solutions, General Haulage & Line Haul, Warehousing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Slider Revolution plugin, Contact Form 7 plugin, The Grid plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional logistics company site with clear service offerings
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces trust
  3. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR policy presence
  4. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection
  5. Multiple group companies linked, indicating a business group structure
  6. No explicit security policy or incident response info published
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Google reCAPTCHA
  8. Website uses WordPress with common plugins and appears well maintained
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using well-known plugins such as Slider Revolution for visual content and Contact Form 7 for form handling. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend enhancements. The site is mobile responsive and optimized for SEO with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the business and website. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with better ARIA roles and keyboard navigation support. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a medium-sized business website but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fullforcelogistics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fullforcelogistics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.