Skip to main content

Security report for fuhrparkverband.at

Fuhrparkverband Austria · Transportation · Austria

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fuhrparkverband Austria (FVA) is a specialized Austrian platform dedicated to fleet management information and networking. It serves as an independent voice and competence partner for fleet operators, companies, and policymakers in Austria. The organization offers membership-based services including events, seminars, newsletters, and surveys to foster knowledge exchange and professionalization in corporate mobility management. The website reflects a medium-sized organization with a clear focus on the transportation sector and a strong presence in Austria. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO tools, but lacks HTTPS, which is a critical security gap. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with active consent mechanisms. The site integrates Google Analytics and Mailchimp for marketing and analytics purposes. Social media presence is robust across major platforms. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich but requires urgent security improvements to enable HTTPS and modern TLS protocols.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fuhrparkverband.at

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FVA holds a unique market position as Austria's sole network and information platform for fleet management, with nearly 100 members managing over 23,000 vehicles nationally. Its business model revolves around membership fees and providing value through knowledge sharing, events, and industry cooperation. The organization is well integrated into the European fleet management ecosystem through FMFE membership, enhancing its cross-border service capabilities. The website's content and structure support its role as a trusted industry partner, targeting companies of various sizes from SMEs to large corporations. Partnerships with job platforms like StepStone indicate additional service channels. The organization's growth and influence are supported by active event hosting and a comprehensive newsletter strategy.

Security posture

The website currently lacks a valid SSL/TLS certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a critical security vulnerability exposing users to data interception risks. No modern TLS protocols or cipher suites are enabled, and security headers such as HSTS are missing. While no known vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the absence of basic SSL security significantly lowers the security posture. Forms are present but no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is strong, but the lack of HTTPS undermines overall security. Immediate remediation is required to install and configure SSL certificates, enable TLS 1.2 or 1.3, and implement security headers to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Install and configure a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and strong cipher suites to secure communications.
  3. Implement HTTP security headers such as HSTS to enforce secure connections.
  4. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update plugins and scripts to minimize vulnerabilities and maintain compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a suite of popular plugins including Yoast SEO, Events Manager, Contact Form 7, Mailchimp for WordPress, and Complianz GDPR Cookie Consent. The site uses jQuery and various JavaScript libraries for UI and analytics. Hosting is provided by world4you.at as indicated by DNS nameservers. Performance metrics are not available, but the page size and resource count suggest room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, the lack of HTTPS and modern TLS support is a significant technical deficiency. The site uses Google Analytics via MonsterInsights for tracking and Mailchimp for newsletter management. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires urgent security upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fuhrparkverband.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fuhrparkverband.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.