Skip to main content

Security report for fuertenetwork.com

CACHINA PE E.I.R.L. · Real Estate · Peru

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Cachina Pe operates as a local Peruvian online marketplace platform focused on classified ads for services, rentals, and sales. The website targets the general public in Peru seeking an easy-to-use platform for posting and browsing ads. The business is small-sized and operates under the legal entity CACHINA PE E.I.R.L., with clear contact information and basic trust indicators such as company registration and privacy policies. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, served via an Nginx server. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support significantly undermines the security posture. Performance data is missing, but the site appears to have basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but lacks advanced optimization. From a security perspective, the site lacks critical protections such as HTTPS, HSTS, security headers, and domain security configurations like DNSSEC and DMARC. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. Privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent mechanism detected. Contact information is available but no dedicated security or data protection contacts are found. Overall, the website presents moderate business credibility but suffers from critical security deficiencies that expose users to risks. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment, security headers, and privacy compliance are essential to enhance trust and protect user data.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fuertenetwork.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
40
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Cachina Pe positions itself as a niche marketplace within the Peruvian market, focusing on classified ads for real estate and services. Its competitive advantage lies in localized service offerings and a simple user interface. The business model relies on user-generated ads and possibly advertising revenue, though no ad networks were detected. The target customers are individuals and small businesses in Peru. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of analytics data. The company maintains a basic partnership ecosystem with no visible subsidiaries or related domains. Strategic observations suggest the company is in early growth stages with opportunities to expand service offerings and improve digital maturity.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low due to the absence of HTTPS and critical security headers. The lack of domain security measures such as DNSSEC and DMARC increases susceptibility to domain spoofing and phishing. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are evident, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Data protection practices are minimal, with no cookie consent or GDPR compliance features. The security culture appears nascent, with no dedicated security contacts or certifications. Business impact of these gaps includes potential data interception, user trust erosion, and regulatory non-compliance risks.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload directives.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Configure DNSSEC, DMARC, and CAA records to enhance domain security and email protection.
  5. Establish a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
CACHINA PE E.I.R.L.
Registration number
RUC: 20613204106
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on Next.js and React, served by an Nginx web server on Ubuntu. DNS is managed via Google Domains, but domain security features are lacking. Performance metrics are unavailable, suggesting monitoring and optimization opportunities. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design but has basic accessibility features. No CMS or third-party analytics tools are detected, indicating a lightweight but potentially under-monitored infrastructure. Technical risks include lack of HTTPS, missing security headers, and absence of domain security configurations, which could impact business operations and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fuertenetwork.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fuertenetwork.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.