Skip to main content

Security report for fruits.co

fruits · Technology · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

fruits.co operates as a specialized online domain sales platform targeting domain buyers and sellers with a focus on ease of use, low commission fees, and AI-driven innovations. The platform offers automated billing, VAT services, and buyer protection, positioning itself as a niche player in the domain marketplace industry. The website is professionally designed using modern web technologies such as Webflow, integrated with analytics and marketing tools including Segment, Facebook Pixel, Intercom, and Trustpilot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, CSRF protection, and comprehensive cookie consent mechanisms, although explicit security headers are not evident in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a detailed privacy policy and cookie management, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, the absence of explicit contact information and redacted WHOIS data suggests a privacy-protected domain registration, common in this business sector. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front with moderate risk, suitable for its business model.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fruits.co

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
84
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets domain investors and sellers, offering a platform with a competitive 9.9% commission fee and buyer protection services. Its business model relies on facilitating domain transactions with automated billing and VAT handling, leveraging AI to enhance sales landing pages. The use of third-party marketing and analytics services supports customer acquisition and retention strategies. The lack of visible contact details may indicate a preference for digital communication channels or privacy considerations. The platform's market position is that of a specialized, technology-driven marketplace within the broader domain sales industry, with potential growth through AI innovation and enhanced user experience.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, CSRF token usage, and a robust cookie consent framework. No immediate vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no public security policy or incident response information, which could enhance transparency and trust. The integration of third-party scripts necessitates ongoing monitoring to mitigate supply chain risks. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Provide clear company contact information to facilitate communication and support trustworthiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize vulnerability exposure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
fruits
Description
fruits is a domain sales platform with unparalleled ease: 9.9% fee (all-in), automated billing and VAT service, converting sales landers, AI-innovations.
Key services
Domain sales platform, Automated billing and VAT service, Buyer protection, AI-powered sales landing pages
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, Cookiebot, Intercom, Facebook Pixel, Segment Analytics, Trustpilot Widget, SplideJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token cookie used
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Segment Analytics, Clearbit
Marketing tools
Intercom, Trustpilot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF blocking
  2. Uses modern web technologies and analytics
  3. Has comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy
  4. WHOIS data is privacy protected with no public registrant info
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages
  6. Security headers not explicitly detected in HTML content
  7. Good user experience and mobile optimization
  8. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Webflow CMS, utilizing modern front-end technologies and integrating multiple third-party services for analytics, marketing, and customer support. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices evident through meta tags and structured content. The use of Cookiebot ensures compliance with cookie regulations. The technical stack is contemporary but could be improved by adding explicit security headers and enhancing accessibility. Hosting details are not explicitly identified but appear stable and secure. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with opportunities for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fruits.co. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fruits.co.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.