Skip to main content

Security report for frontio.net

Frontio NET s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Frontio NET s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based small technology company specializing in custom web development, front-end coding, and e-commerce solutions primarily using WordPress CMS. The company targets businesses and agencies seeking tailored web solutions and has a professional web presence with client references and contact information clearly displayed. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress stack with JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Swiper.js, and it integrates Google Analytics and Yoast SEO for performance and search optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and it does not publish a security policy or incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent banner but no visible privacy policy or terms of service. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional but could improve in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frontio.net

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Frontio NET operates in the technology sector focusing on web development and e-commerce solutions. Its business model is service-oriented, delivering custom coding and CMS implementations to clients, including agencies. The company has a niche market position with a focus on quality and custom solutions rather than templated products. Revenue streams likely come from project-based contracts and long-term collaborations for website maintenance and updates. The target customer segment includes small to medium businesses and agencies in the Czech Republic. The company demonstrates growth potential through client references and a consistent brand presence. The partnership ecosystem is limited publicly, with no explicit partner or subsidiary domains identified. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality and client satisfaction with room for expanding security and compliance offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain status protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security indicates gaps in defense-in-depth. No security policy or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces moderate tracking but is managed with a cookie consent banner. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. Compliance with GDPR is partial due to the lack of a privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Review and optimize cookie consent mechanisms and data retention policies to ensure full GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Frontio NET s.r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Frontio NET s.r.o.
Description
Web development, coding, and e-commerce solutions with custom WordPress implementations and front-end development services.
Key services
Custom website development, Front-end coding, WordPress CMS implementation, E-commerce solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional small business site for a Czech web development company.
  2. Content is in Czech language with clear business focus.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with express consent mechanism.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical addresses.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and Google Analytics.
  7. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements. SEO is managed via the Yoast SEO plugin, and Google Analytics is used for traffic analysis. The site loads a variety of CSS and JavaScript assets asynchronously to improve performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. However, no advanced performance optimization techniques such as CDN usage or caching headers are explicitly visible. Accessibility features are basic but present. The domain is registered with Tucows Domains Inc. and has transfer and update prohibitions set, indicating domain ownership security. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical risks that could be mitigated. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frontio.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frontio.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.