Skip to main content

Security report for frin.cz

České centrum fundraisingu · Non-profit · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

České centrum fundraisingu operates FRIN.cz, an annual acceleration program designed to support Czech charitable organizations in enhancing their fundraising campaigns. The website presents a professional and well-structured platform offering mentoring, training, and resources tailored to non-profits. The organization is well-established, with a domain age dating back to 2001, and maintains partnerships with reputable entities such as Erste Stiftung and Česká spořitelna. Technically, the site leverages WordPress with modern frameworks and plugins, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, cookie consent, and use of security plugins, though explicit security policies and incident response details are not publicly available. Overall, the site demonstrates high trustworthiness and compliance with GDPR, supported by accessible privacy and cookie policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frin.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong position in the Czech non-profit sector, focusing on fundraising education and campaign acceleration. Its business model centers on providing value-added services such as mentoring, workshops, and resource libraries to charitable organizations. The presence of testimonials and partner endorsements indicates a healthy ecosystem and positive market reception. The website's content and structure reflect a clear understanding of its target audience, primarily Czech non-profits seeking to improve fundraising effectiveness. Revenue streams likely include program fees, grants, and partnerships. The organization's digital presence is mature, with integrated marketing and analytics tools supporting outreach and engagement.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and use of security-focused plugins like CryptX. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Security headers are partially implemented or not explicitly confirmed, and regular updates and audits are recommended to maintain resilience. Overall, the security measures align with best practices for a non-profit educational platform but could be enhanced with formal documentation and proactive disclosure.

Recommendations

  1. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
České centrum fundraisingu
Description
FRIN.cz is an annual acceleration program for selected charitable organizations aiming to significantly develop their fundraising campaigns.
Key services
Fundraising campaign acceleration, Mentoring, Workshops and training, Resource library, Online consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap 5, Font Awesome 6.8.2, SiteOrigin Panels, CryptX plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (CryptX)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
SmartEmailing (newsletter)
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is focused on a Czech non-profit fundraising acceleration program.
  3. Multiple testimonials and partner logos enhance trust.
  4. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and accessible.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  8. No terms of service page found, which could be improved.
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing Bootstrap for responsive design and Font Awesome for icons. It integrates several plugins including SiteOrigin Panels for layout management and CryptX for security enhancements. Analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and SmartEmailing support user engagement and data-driven decision-making. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The hosting environment appears stable, using REG-INTERNET-CZ registrar and Forpsi nameservers. Technical debt is minimal, but opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security header implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frin.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frin.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.