Skip to main content

Security report for fricke-transporte.de

FRICKE Transporte GmbH · Transportation · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FRICKE Transporte GmbH is a family-owned logistics and transport company based in Germany, operating in its fourth generation. The company offers a range of services including freight forwarding, vehicle washing, vehicle workshop services, and vehicle inspections. Their market position is that of a trusted local and international logistics provider with a focus on reliable and tailored transport solutions. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and integrates a modern cookie consent mechanism via Usercentrics, reflecting a moderate level of digital maturity. The technical infrastructure is solid with HTTPS enforced and a clean, professional design that supports good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is generally strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, although the absence of security headers and a security policy page suggests room for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and compliant with GDPR, with clear contact information and social media presence enhancing credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fricke-transporte.de

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses requiring logistics and transport services, leveraging its family business heritage as a competitive advantage. Its business model focuses on providing customized logistics solutions with a broad service portfolio. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise with a localized market focus but also international capabilities. The company maintains active social media channels on Facebook and Instagram, supporting customer engagement and brand visibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The business appears stable with a professional online presence and clear service offerings.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a reputable consent management platform for cookie compliance, indicating good privacy practices. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the overall security maturity. No forms or input fields on the homepage reduce attack surface, but the site would benefit from a security.txt file and explicit vulnerability disclosure information. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The security score is good but could be enhanced with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO metadata to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FRICKE Transporte GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FRICKE Transporte GmbH
Description
Als erfahrenes Familienunternehmen bieten wir maßgeschneiderte Logistiklösungen für unsere Kunden an. Unser Ziel ist es, Ihnen einen schnellen und zuverlässigen Transport Ihrer Waren zu garantieren, damit Sie sich auf Ihr Kerngeschäft konzentrieren können. Mit unserem breiten Angebot an Transport- und Logistikdienstleistungen bieten wir Lösungen für alle Branchen. Ob national oder international, wir sorgen für eine reibungslose Abwicklung Ihrer Transporte und setzen dabei auf modernste Technologie und sorgfältige Planung. Unser engagiertes Team steht Ihnen bei allen Anliegen zur Seite und sorgt dafür, dass Ihre Waren sicher und pünktlich ankommen. Wir legen großen Wert auf eine individuelle Betreuung unserer Kunden.
Key services
Spedition (Freight forwarding), LKW / PKW Waschanlage (Truck/Car wash), KFZ-Werkstatt (Vehicle workshop), KÜS (HU / AU) vehicle inspections
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Elementor 3.32.5, Usercentrics Consent Management Platform, Google Maps (embedded with consent), FontAwesome icons
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with explicit user consent
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Usercentrics
Marketing tools
Usercentrics Consent Management Platform
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Professional logistics company website with clear service offerings.
  3. Cookie consent implemented via Usercentrics.
  4. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  5. No forms detected on the homepage; contact info provided via email and phone.
  6. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
  7. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  8. Google Maps embedded with consent mechanism.
  9. No analytics scripts explicitly detected.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building, which provides flexibility and ease of content management. The site uses Usercentrics for cookie consent, ensuring GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with minified CSS and JS assets, but no explicit performance optimization tools detected. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. No analytics or tracking scripts beyond Usercentrics were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fricke-transporte.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fricke-transporte.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.