Skip to main content

Security report for fricis.lv

FRICIS · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FRICIS is a Latvian e-commerce business specializing in the sale of honey and bee-related products, including gift sets and herbal teas. The website targets general consumers interested in natural and locally produced bee products. The business operates primarily online with a localized market focus in Latvia. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Technical infrastructure includes modern JavaScript libraries and Amazon Cloudfront CDN hosting, with Google Analytics integrated for visitor tracking. Mobile optimization is good, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy policy documentation. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy small retail business with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fricis.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche retailer of honey and bee products in Latvia, leveraging an e-commerce model to reach customers. Its competitive advantage lies in offering locally produced, artisanal products with unique gift options. The business model is direct-to-consumer online sales, supported by social media marketing on Facebook and Instagram. Revenue streams are primarily product sales with occasional promotions. The target customer segment includes health-conscious and gift-buying consumers in Latvia. The website's partnership ecosystem is limited, with no identified subsidiaries or partners. Growth indicators are not explicitly stated but the presence of special offers and popular products suggests active marketing. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced privacy compliance and security transparency to build greater customer trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps exist due to the absence of a clear privacy policy and incident response contact information. Data protection practices appear minimal, with no visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure program. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website content. Overall, the security posture is functional but could be significantly improved to meet GDPR and NIS2 standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy policy page detailing GDPR compliance and data handling practices.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FRICIS
Description
Medus interneta veikals piedāvā bišu produktus, vaska sveces, tējas un medus dāvanu komplektus, ražots Latvijā.
Key services
Online sales of honey and bee products, Gift sets, Herbal teas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox3, Bannerplay, ResponsiveVideos, Mozlive, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookie consent script
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a Latvian e-commerce store specializing in honey and bee products.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with localized product offerings.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or footer.
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented with options to accept or decline.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  6. No privacy policy page explicitly found, but terms of service and cookie policy links exist.
  7. Login and registration forms present with client-side validation and error messages.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  9. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  10. Website uses HTTPS with no visible mixed content issues.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, utilizing a combination of jQuery 2.2.4 and several plugins for UI components like Fancybox3 and Bannerplay. Hosting is provided via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, ensuring reliable content delivery. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization by reducing external script dependencies. Accessibility is basic, with no ARIA landmarks or advanced features detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updated libraries and enhanced security configurations to reduce technical debt and improve resilience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fricis.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fricis.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.