Skip to main content

Security report for fregatsail.com

SIA Fregat · Transportation · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA Fregat operates as a specialized boating education provider in Latvia, offering theoretical and practical training for motor and sailing yachts. Their services target individuals seeking recreational boating licenses for vessels up to 24 meters, focusing on both international and Latvian waters. The company positions itself as a niche local training school with a professional approach and partnership with the Latvian Yacht Club. Technically, the website is built on the Webnode CMS platform, hosted via AWS Cloudfront, and employs modern web technologies including HTTPS and JavaScript-based analytics. While the site is accessible and mobile-optimized, it lacks comprehensive security headers and formal privacy or terms of service documentation. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and contact availability. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, impacting overall trust. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and terms policies, and clarifying domain registration details to improve credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fregatsail.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
35
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a specific segment of boating enthusiasts and professionals in Latvia, providing essential training for boating licenses. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on education and certification preparation. The partnership with the Latvian Yacht Club adds credibility and local market integration. Revenue likely derives from course fees and practical training sessions. The website content and structure reflect a small-sized enterprise with a clear focus on quality and individual approach. Growth potential exists in expanding course offerings and digital presence. The lack of visible contact details and formal policies may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance. No evident partnerships beyond the yacht club are identified, and no subsidiary or parent company relationships are disclosed.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and implements a cookie consent mechanism aligned with basic privacy requirements. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is available, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a significant red flag, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified for this business type. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency, contact availability, and technical security controls to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add verified company contact information such as official emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  4. Investigate and resolve domain WHOIS registration inconsistencies to strengthen legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Develop and communicate an incident response plan and security policy to demonstrate commitment to security best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA Fregat
Description
SIA Fregat kopā ar Latvijas Jahtklubu (Lielupe) piedāvā teorētiskas un praktīskas motor/buru jahtas apmācības.
Key services
Motor yacht training up to 24m with international license, Motor and sailing yacht training up to 12m for Latvian waters, Theoretical and practical boating courses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cloudfront CDN, Webnode platform
Platforms
Webnode CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected
  2. Content is focused on boating education in Latvia
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent banner is implemented and functional
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the site
  6. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection
  7. Website uses Webnode CMS hosted on AWS Cloudfront CDN
  8. Security headers are missing, but HTTPS is enforced
  9. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform, leveraging AWS Cloudfront CDN for hosting and content delivery, which supports good performance and scalability. The front-end uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with responsive design elements ensuring usability on mobile devices. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and tracking purposes. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy documentation, which are important for modern web applications. The absence of WHOIS data suggests potential administrative or registration issues that should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small educational service but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fregatsail.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fregatsail.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.