Skip to main content

Security report for frauenforum-unna.de

Frauenforum im Kreis Unna e.V. · Non-profit · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Frauenforum im Kreis Unna e.V. is a small non-profit organization based in Germany providing critical social support services to women and children affected by domestic and sexual violence. Their key offerings include a women's shelter (Frauenhaus), counseling services, and housing emergency aid. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates modern tools such as Matomo for analytics and Usercentrics for cookie consent management. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and accessible, reflecting a good level of digital maturity for a non-profit entity. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks published security policies and security headers, which are recommended for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though it would benefit from enhanced privacy and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching frauenforum-unna.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
95
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the non-profit sector focused on social welfare and crisis intervention for vulnerable women and children in the Kreis Unna region. Their business model centers on providing shelter, counseling, and housing assistance, likely funded by donations and public grants. The website supports their mission with clear service descriptions and contact phone numbers but lacks direct email contacts. The presence of an online counseling link indicates digital service expansion. The organization maintains a consistent brand and uses trusted technologies, positioning itself as a credible local service provider. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent management platform, which are positive security and privacy practices. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of Matomo analytics with cookies disabled suggests a privacy-conscious approach. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be strengthened by publishing security policies, adding security headers, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user and organizational responsibilities.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance security transparency.
  5. Consider adding verified contact emails for general and security-related inquiries to improve communication channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Frauenforum im Kreis Unna e.V.
Description
Non-profit organization providing support, shelter, and counseling for women and children affected by violence, including services like Frauenhaus (women's shelter), Beratungsstelle (counseling center), and Wohnungsnotfallhilfe (housing emergency aid).
Key services
Frauenhaus (women's shelter), Frauen- und Mädchenberatungsstelle (women and girls counseling), Wohnungsnotfallhilfe (housing emergency aid), Online counseling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Divi Theme 4.27.4, Amelia Booking Plugin, Matomo Analytics, Usercentrics Consent Management, jQuery 3.7.1
Frameworks
WordPress, Divi
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on social services for women and children in crisis.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Usercentrics CMP.
  5. No contact emails found in the HTML content; phone numbers are provided.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and several plugins.
  8. Matomo analytics used with cookies disabled.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Good accessibility features and mobile optimization observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform with the Divi theme, supported by plugins like Amelia Booking and Usercentrics CMP. It uses Matomo for privacy-friendly analytics with cookies disabled. The site loads JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.1 and FontAwesome icons. The design is responsive and accessible, with good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with some deferred CSS loading and lazy loading of images. No major technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Hosting details are not explicit but name servers indicate local hosting under the Kreis Unna domain. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small non-profit website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with frauenforum-unna.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review frauenforum-unna.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.