Skip to main content

Security report for fratellisanfrancesco.it

Fondazione Fratelli di San Francesco d’Assisi · Non-profit · Italy

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fondazione Fratelli di San Francesco d’Assisi is an Italian non-profit organization dedicated to supporting vulnerable individuals including minors, adults, and the elderly through free assistance and inclusion programs. The website serves as an informational and donation platform, leveraging WordPress with Elementor and GiveWP plugins to facilitate donations and present their mission. The technical infrastructure is modern and includes SEO optimization and tracking via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fratellisanfrancesco.it

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fratellisanfrancesco.it, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
4
Third parties
2
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fratellisanfrancesco.it.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The foundation operates in the non-profit sector focusing on social assistance and inclusion services. Its business model relies on donations and volunteer support, targeting individuals in fragile situations and donors. The website positions the foundation as a committed social actor with clear mission statements and donation calls. The use of modern CMS and plugins indicates a moderate level of digital maturity. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified. The foundation maintains a consistent brand image and good content quality, supporting its credibility in the Italian non-profit market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, nor a vulnerability disclosure mechanism. Tracking scripts are present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism was detected, which may pose compliance risks. The site should enhance security headers and publish clear security and privacy policies to improve its security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance details.
  3. Add a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information including official emails and phone numbers for transparency and trust.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fondazione Fratelli di San Francesco d’Assisi
Description
La Fondazione Fratelli di San Francesco d’Assisi è al fianco di chi è in difficoltà, ogni giorno. Accoglie e sostiene minori, adulti e anziani in situazioni di fragilità, senza distinzioni, offrendo assistenza gratuita e percorsi di inclusione per costruire un futuro più dignitoso e autonomo.
Key services
Accoglienza, Assistenza, Integrazione
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Yoast SEO plugin, Elementor, GiveWP donation plugin, jQuery, Google Analytics, PixelYourSite
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce tokens in AJAX calls

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
PixelYourSite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based non-profit foundation site.
  2. Donation functionality is implemented via GiveWP plugin.
  3. SEO is enhanced using Yoast SEO plugin.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the visible content or metadata.
  6. Social media tracking via Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics is active.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor for page building and GiveWP for donation management. It uses modern web technologies including jQuery and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking. The site loads external fonts and scripts from trusted CDNs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fratellisanfrancesco.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fratellisanfrancesco.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.