Skip to main content

Security report for francumaize.lv

Franču maize · Retail · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Franču maize is a small, established bakery and confectionery business based in Riga, Latvia, operating since 2004. The company offers a wide range of bakery products including cakes, pastries, bread, and catering services for events. Their website is built on WordPress and incorporates modern web technologies and plugins such as Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, and Contact Form 7. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes essential business information and customer testimonials, reflecting a good level of digital maturity for a small business. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though there is room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional image consistent with a local bakery business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching francumaize.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets local consumers in Riga seeking quality bakery and confectionery products, as well as event catering clients. The company leverages a retail and catering business model with direct sales, custom orders, and delivery services. The market position is that of a well-known local bakery with a loyal customer base and recognition from restaurants and hotels. The website supports business growth by providing online contact forms and showcasing product offerings and testimonials. The partnership ecosystem includes social media presence on Facebook. No evidence of parent or subsidiary companies was found.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. The contact form includes spam protection via WP SpamShield. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance security readiness. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate security vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a security.txt file to provide clear vulnerability disclosure and incident response contacts.
  4. Include a dedicated security policy or incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Franču maize
Description
Konditoreja Rīgā - Smalkmaizītes, Kliņģeri, Tortes, Pīrāgi, svaigi cepta Maize u.c Konditorejas izstrādājumi beķerejā un uz pasūtījuma! Ienāc Francumaize.lv. Uzņēmums Franču maiznīca darbojas kopš 2004. gada, piedāvājot konditorejas un beķerejas produktus Rīgā, Latvijā.
Key services
Bakery products, Confectionery products, Custom cake orders, Event catering and banquet services, Food delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Maps API, YouTube Player API, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, Contact Form 7, Cookie Law Info plugin, Select2, Bootstrap, Font Awesome
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Contact form with spam protection (WP SpamShield)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based bakery site with good content and user experience.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No visible security headers detected; SSL is properly configured.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, address, and contact form.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  8. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  9. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including PHP, jQuery, Bootstrap, and various plugins for SEO, forms, and sliders. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for analytics and tracking. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile-optimized. The presence of lazy loading and minified CSS/JS indicates some performance optimization. However, no hosting provider information was found. The site uses Google Fonts and external resources from trusted domains. Overall, the technical infrastructure is suitable for a small retail business but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with francumaize.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review francumaize.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.