Skip to main content

Security report for fpp-pff.be

Prins Filip Fonds | Fonds Prince Philippe · Non-profit · Belgium

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Prins Filip Fonds is a non-profit foundation established in 1998 and managed by the reputable Koning Boudewijnstichting. It focuses on fostering intercultural dialogue and cooperation between the different communities of Belgium through project funding and educational initiatives. The website reflects a professional and well-structured digital presence, supporting its mission with clear content and multilingual support. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with modern JavaScript libraries and Google Analytics integration. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and privacy policies implemented, though some security headers and incident response details could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy and aligns well with its stated non-profit mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fpp-pff.be

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fpp-pff.be, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fpp-pff.be right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Prins Filip Fonds occupies a niche in the Belgian non-profit sector, promoting social cohesion and intercultural exchange. Its competitive advantage lies in its backing by the Koning Boudewijnstichting and its targeted support for youth and educational projects. The foundation's business model is grant and project-based, focusing on community impact rather than revenue generation. The website's multilingual approach and social media presence indicate a broad target audience across Belgium's linguistic communities. Partnerships with organizations like Verhulst-Vandamme for web development show a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include active project counts and engagement metrics, though financial data is not publicly available.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure. Privacy and cookie policies comply with GDPR standards, implemented via Iubenda with consent mechanisms. However, the absence of explicit security headers and incident response contacts limits the security maturity level. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, which could enhance transparency. The use of third-party plugins necessitates regular security audits to mitigate risks. Overall, the site is secure for its purpose but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear incident response contact information to improve vulnerability disclosure and response capabilities.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to minimize vulnerabilities from third-party components.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to ensure compliance with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain transparency on data retention policies and provide users with clear information on how their data is handled.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Koning Boudewijnstichting
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Prins Filip Fonds | Fonds Prince Philippe
Description
Het Prins Filipfonds, opgericht in 1998 en beheerd door de Koning Boudewijnstichting, stimuleert ontmoetingen en samenwerking tussen mensen uit de verschillende gemeenschappen van België. Door gerichte projectondersteuning en innovatieve initiatieven biedt het Fonds kansen om dialoog en uitwisseling te bevorderen, met als doel een solidaire en verdraagzame samenleving.
Key services
Project funding, Support for intercultural exchanges, Educational initiatives, Media collaboration programs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Swiper.js, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of privacy and cookie policies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. Content is in Dutch with alternate language versions available (French, German).
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in visible content.
  4. Social media links to Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube are present and appear official.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder and Yoast SEO plugin.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented via Iubenda with consent mechanisms.
  7. No visible security.txt or explicit security incident response information.
  8. No forms detected on the homepage; contact page not analyzed here.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  10. Website targets non-profit sector focused on intercultural dialogue in Belgium.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It leverages jQuery and Swiper.js for interactive elements and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. The technical stack is standard for non-profit organizations, providing a balance between ease of management and functionality. No hosting provider details were identified from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business goals effectively with room for optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fpp-pff.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fpp-pff.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.